PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF THE ITALIAN PATENT DEPOSIT ENTITLED “FLYING AND FLOATING CARS WITH INTERACTIVE GLOBAL LINEAR MOTORS AND THRUST OF NEWTON AND LORENTZ”.
(26th open letter to the International Court of Justice and the United Nations)
Dear institutional authorities, publishers, entrepreneurs, this presentation is necessary, because spam filters do not allow to transmit long documents with attached drawings.
The identification of interactive principles based on the exploitation of the static pressure of the compressed air and the circulation of incompressible water eliminates the costs due to fuels, nuclear reactors, electrodes that are consumed, energy accumulators, energy distribution networks. Primary energy can be produced everywhere in the instant it serves in fixed and mobile plants without the need to carry out large hydroelectric works, thermal, nuclear, solar, wind power plants. Nothing can be cheaper, more efficient and cleaner than the simultaneous exploitation of the static pressure of compressed air, the circulation of water and the one-way flow, because water and air are not consumed and the energy produced is due. to the product of air pressure for the flow rate and density of water, which is a thousand times higher than a combustion gas. Today, these combustion gases are used all over the world but they are a stupid solution both from an environmental, technical and economic point of view, which devalues the value of the entire world science and the entire ruling class. The current patent laws are a scam or a huge international mistake against inventors unrelated to the centers of economic power that have produced global warming and immense public debt. The main architects of this scam or mistake are the United Nations, which regulates patent procedures, inventors' rights and taxes to be paid through WIPO. Therefore inventors who are not linked to the economic centers of power that are the main victims of this system, must describe these anomalies even when they file a patent, being excluded a priori from any advantages that the invention would produce by not being able to pay the required fees due to the power games made by those who manage economic power, who pretend not to understand the most innovative inventions, which would undermine their obsolete and polluting systems, which should not even be accepted by international legal bodies, if political power games and economics did not conceal sustainable inventions, impeding their experimentation, which cannot be done by small private inventors, devoid of any economic resource. The current laws, by not recognizing copyrights separate from industrial property, in fact, deny private inventors not tied to these powers the intellectual property which is recognized by all authors of intellectual works. In fact, only inventors are forced to pay the fees on patents granted even if they do not find lenders and only they are forced to spend money to make legal appeals against patents not granted by bureaucrats who do not have the requirements to scientifically judge the inventions that exceed the the current state of the art, above all, from a scientific point of view, using logical synergies between the scientific principles already legislated before the current industrial era by scientists such as Pascal, Bernoulli, Venturi, Torricelli, Henry, Newton, Maxwell, Lorentz, Einstein. Although these scientific principles have led to significant technological advances, they have not protected the environment, have not produced sustainable energy and have not been able to put together the push of Newton and Lorentz to conquer space, atmosphere and underwater environments. In fact, a lot of energy is needed to overcome gravitational forces and without identifying the interactive principles that make energy sustainable and clean, we have no hope of conquering space.
The narrow mindedness of lawmakers does not understand that if inventors turn into entrepreneurs to industrially produce a single invention, they cannot study and publish inventions related to the scientific principles identified. If an invention is truly innovative, it produces many side effects and many applications. Only the inventor can see these applications in advance, having studied the topic differently from the existing systems. Obviously, if he becomes an entrepreneur with little money, he takes many years to make only the prototypes of a single invention and the state of the art cannot advance globally. Instead, the advancement of the state of the art must be global, even if only virtual, until the centers of world power admit their mistakes and really decide to finance interactive inventions, which compared to the current ones, have potential endless.
In fact, it is not enough to identify the correct scientific principles, it is also necessary to put them together correctly to prevent them from conflicting and optimize the yields in many applications simultaneously. These applications certainly cannot develop the inventor alone. For this reason, the United Nations and international judges should protect intellectual property instead of industrial property. In fact, the scientific principles well identified by pre-industrial scientists have never been coherently put together by modern scientists and inventors, dependent on public and multinational companies that still work in watertight compartments. With their silences, these are showing that they would not have identified the synergies identified by myself, even in hundreds of years. Not even the undersigned would have identified them, had he not left a large automotive multinational to work in a small company that installs public environmental and energy systems, where he works with a mentality opposite to that of large industry. Only as a pensioner did I decide to be an inventor to develop interactive systems, which as I have shown, would revolutionize both sectors from an energy and environmental point of view. However, I could not have proposed any solution without the important help received by the scientists of the past, mentioned above, who belong to the pre-industrial era and modern electromagnetism. In fact, the current development model has produced not only global warming, but also nuclear, alluvial and immense economic disasters is due to the fact that fluid dynamics has stopped in the pre-industrial state, while all other sectors have advanced and have exploited modern advances due to electromagnetism and electronics. Instead, the undersigned, he realized that by re-evaluating the neglected fluid dynamics principles and coupling them with modern electromagnetism and the electronics of industrial processes, we can avoid thermal, nuclear processes and current hydroelectric systems that produce drought and floods. Therefore, interactive systems would render current large hydroelectric, thermal and nuclear works useless, also reducing the value of current renewable energies, which despite technological improvements, always have low yields, not being interactive but based on individual physical, thermal, chemical principles, electrolytic. The undersigned has already denounced these things to no avail for many years.
It was the end of the year 2018, I was writing another complaint article, when I realized that even the world transport system could undergo significant updates in addition to those already proposed by myself with the following articles http://www.spawhe.eu/aerospatial-pressurized-hydroelectric-transport-system/, http://www.spawhe.eu/hydroelectric-power-auto-with-torque-peripheral-to-the-wheels/, which can be read in PDF in English and Italian by clicking on the links mentioned Therefore, I interrupted the article I was writing and began to study the interactive solutions to put together the push of Newton and Lorentz in space and ground transport through collaboration between fluid dynamics and electromagnetics already cooperated very well in the cited patents, although world power centers have not appreciated them.
This presentation follows a few days that which accompanied the filing of a very important patent entitled "aerospace and submarine transport system with primary and induced interactive global linear motors", as flying and floating cars complete the use of global linear motors. interactive, which in the previous intellectual patent filing dealt with only large international, space and submarine means of transport. This patent deals with the lightest land transport of the future which should not pass through international airports and ports.
It is very strange that after filing the patent filing No. 102020000000031 on 03.01.2020, on the large means of transport of the future and I was going to develop to publish this solution, the Italian patent office anticipated me, proposing the update of the claims of patent filing No. 102016000087373 of 25/08/2016 entitled "hydroelectric car with peripheral drive torque at the wheels" which can be read on the web at the following address http://www.spawhe.eu/hydroelectric-power -auto-with-torque-peripheral-to-the-wheels /, while the compressed hydroelectric energy and the patents concerning it, mentioned above, have been declared "Perpetual motion" by the Italian and European patent offices, including the patent filing on a new way of flying based only on Newton's thrust which can be downloaded in PDF in English and Italian http://www.spawhe.eu/aerospatial-pressurized-hydroelectric-transport-system/.
Paradoxically, after three years and three months from the patent filing, the Italian patent office asks me to update for the third time the claims of the filing entitled "hydroelectric car with peripheral drive torque at the wheels". I should report the page and the lines from which I will extract the claims for the third time, so that they can easily evaluate the extent of the changes made to protect industrial property, which the undersigned will never be able to exercise, having no economic means and not even the age to turn into an entrepreneur. If I don't change the claims according to their bureaucratic wishes, they refuse me the grant of the patent. How they refused me the grant of the Italian patent of the "pump with double separate feeding up to the impeller" which, despite the simplicity, is one of the most important inventions of all time. Without this pump, it is not possible to create compressed hydroelectric energy that allows you to statically exploit the elastic pressure of the air by circulating water on the principle of impenetrability of the bodies. Therefore, without such a pump, sustainable primary energy cannot exist, which avoids thermal and nuclear processes. This energy is not consumed, it only wears the materials that make up the systems. For this reason it is the only one that can power the electromagnetism of the current generators, which power the electric motors, which make the pumps turn, the turbofans that produce Newton's thrust, and move the permanent magnets that produce other induced currents that they produce the Lorentz thrust which adds up to that of Newton.
In other words, world science has not had the opportunity to realize that Newton and Lorentz's thrust to overcome the gravitational force can be added because no world industrialist wanted to modify the pumps, no world scientist has supported this invention. The international patent of the undersigned has lapsed because the undersigned has not paid the maintenance fees of the international patent. But what is worse is the fact that the Italian patent office, instead of supporting an Italian invention that with great effort had conquered the title of international patent, also undergoing the payment of international filing fees (about 3500 euros), said independently, that the pump with the double separate power supply up to the impeller is not an industrial invention, but a simple utility model. I refused the utility model title and continued to believe in this invention, producing other inventions with the same system, but not spending money on legal appeals or obtaining new international patents, having understood that the world public ruling class, including that scientific, reads a script already written on environmental matters. He denounces the problems, but does not find the solutions, despite the funding for public research. With their own silences, together with those of the multinationals, they hinder the financing of sustainable and interactive inventions without anyone world statesman noticing anything. Is all this ever possible?
I will try to satisfy the bureaucratic request of the Italian patent office to update the claims of the hydroelectric car to receive the patent. But it is difficult to satisfy them, since they are mainly interested in the formal aspect. Not how it works and what side effects it produces. Probably, they did not realize that the hydroelectric car cannot operate without the pump with the separate dual power supply up to the impeller, which they have declared a utility model. How can a utility model circulate a car at a speed of 150 km / h without fuel? What are the claims if they don't understand how the car works? The compressed hydroelectric engine virtually mounted on the hydroelectric car begins another era of world transport, it will undergo many changes and many updates, as thermal and electric motors have undergone in one hundred years of industrial history. But the operating principle is fundamental and distinguishes the difference between an intellectual patent that begins a new era of development and industrial patents that develop and update details. However, for world legislators, intellectual patents have no right if the inventor is poor and cannot pay unfair taxes which on public utility patents should not even be paid.
In this ambiguous international context regarding patents and industrial and intellectual property, the undersigned has realized that the compressed hydroelectric engine conceived to enter the hood of a car and make it walk on the earth, cannot be useful to make it fly in the atmosphere even if the energy principle is valid as a primary source of electricity. Therefore, it has changed the shape and substance of the compressed hydroelectric motor making it also inducer of a magnetic flux so that it can produce the induced currents that produce the Lorentz thrust. He also realized that the solutions to make cars fly must be different from those that make the planes and spaceships of the future fly, but the best primary energy will always be compressed hydroelectric. Hence, the undersigned developed two new intellectual patents. This does not prevent multinationals from developing new industrial patent patents if they also recognize copyrights to intellectually conceived systems. Personally, I don't see any contrast between industrial and intellectual property because cars and planes in over one hundred years of history have not been able to eliminate fuels and have not been able to add to Lorentz's thrust to Newton's thrust that it is indispensable for navigating in space but also to help Newton's thrust to overcome the Earth's gravitational force.
Today, almost all of the inventors are employees of public and private companies. As world governments have stopped making entrepreneurs, public inventors are also working to sell patents to multinationals, so no one develops global and interactive projects of general interest. According to the situation of world development in such conditions, all power centers, public and private, pretend not to understand interactive inventions, while paradoxical situations occur such as the case of hydroelectric cars which, after three years and three months from the deposit of patent, the Italian office is still examining hydroelectric cars, but only from a formal point of view. These cars, however, even if they have never been realized, from an intellectual point of view, were the first step in the revolution of the world's aerospace and transport through the "flying and floating cars with interactive global engines and thrust of Newton and Lorentz", of which I speak in this new patent filing. This shows that it is necessary to contest the entire system of international patents, for the simple fact that at least a part of the world inventors must be independent of the centers of power that have already made development choices and prevent the emergence of alternative solutions. Only by examining the real paradoxical situations that the current system produces can we understand that this system has never worked. Here are some examples:
1) The facts have shown that the world authorities and multinationals did not like the invention called "hydroelectric car with peripheral drive torque at the wheels" despite the fact that no car exists on planet Earth that works with a hydroelectric engine and with the applied drive torque on the periphery of the wheels. Only these two facts demonstrate that the invention has the requirements of inventive originality and industrial applicability regardless of how the claims are written. The claims are a formal requirement that could damage the inventor's industrial property rights, not intellectual property, because hydroelectric cars do not exist, but intellectual property and copyrights do not exist, if the inventor does not find lenders and does not pays the patent maintenance fees.
2) Receiving the title of an industrial patent after four years from the patent filing and continuing not to find public and private financiers, for an inventor it is more of a damage than a benefit, having to start paying also the maintenance fees of the patent even if he doesn't have the means to be an entrepreneur. The undersigned has obtained fifteen national patents on topics of public utility, five of which transformed into international patents and one European, paying the filing fees unnecessarily and in some cases also the maintenance fees without finding interlocutors. Do not say that it is the laws of the market that rule. Because the market is distorted by the same international laws, which by not prohibiting the production of polluting energies, and by not requiring by law the producers of means of transport to close the cycles that open organic and inorganic, have allowed the multinationals of transport not to take considering the invention of the undersigned. These will continue to disregard my invention and I, as a mere retiree, would needlessly pay maintenance fees to maintain my rights. All of this is absurd and shameful on the part of international legal entities. Above all, since they are inventions of public utility.
3) The trade in patents between public and private bodies, allowed by world legislators, has created a web of interests between public researchers who sell and private companies who buy which also prevents us from talking about the alternative solutions proposed by the excluded. The public inventors to sell patents to multinationals did not produce any global invention, which were developed only virtually without any funding and published on the website http://www.spawhe.eu. Even in the international conferences organized by the United Nations, COP, which should remedy the scientific and regulatory shortcomings of individual countries, there has never been talk of interactive energies and purification. How can private inventors bear the brunt of their research and maintain rights over their patents?
4) Private inventors can only defend themselves by fighting for the recognition of copyright and the intellectual property of inventions, which are recognized to all authors of intellectual works, but not to inventors who cannot find financiers, who are those who are not tied to power centers that deal with environmental and energy problems. The other public inventors are saved by selling partial and commercial patents affecting multinationals. Multinational corporations will never buy inventions which prove that their inventions are environmentally and economically wrong. Governments continue to fund research to investigate the seriousness of the problems, but do not experiment with the interactive solutions proposed by the few independent inventors so as not to antagonize the multinational that buy their patents and threaten layoffs if they lose market share.
Believing that I have finished my inventor activity, although I will continue to write some articles, I hope to be able to be a full-time grandfather and enjoy my six grandchildren, hoping that others will come. Life must continue and possibly become much longer than the current one, also thanks to robotics, cybernetics, but above all, the artificial heart oxygenator of the blood, which is an interactive mini global engine, considered "perpetual motion" by the Italian patent office, http://www.spawhe.eu/cuore-artificiale-ossigenatore-del-sangue-autonomo-energeticamente/http://www.spawhe.eu/artificial-heart-oxygenator-of-blood-energyically-autonomous/ without the ministers of labor, economic development, the environment, and the governments of the past fifteen years have never defended or experienced one of the inventions of the undersigned, which until proven otherwise, are Italian inventions. This explains why this country that gave birth to the best inventors in the world is today the European tail light in terms of growth.
An invention not financed and not made by entrepreneurs and world governments is like a book written but not published by publishers. Therefore, an unread book is always new and when publishers decide to publish it, they cannot deny the writer's rights. This concept only patent lawmakers do not understand. Who do these legislators work for? Who do they obey?
I think that governments should be grateful for the birth of SPAWHE's interactive systems because having created an intertwining of too strong economic interests with multinationals, they have lost the ability to govern and plan global sustainable development. These interests would not have led to these solutions even in thousands of years, destroying the planet, even if the multinationals improve the performance of the machines. SPAWHE replaced the world public science that worked to sell its patents to multinationals, having virtually modified the chimneys, made the sewers purifying, created the limestone greenhouses, the superimposed biological ponds, the artificial welling, the submerged hydroelectric energy, the pumps with the dual power supply shot up to the impeller, the hydroelectric energy with the recycling of the water in an open vessel, the ion exchange desalination that produces energy instead of consuming it, the hydroelectric current generators, the hydroelectric car, the submerged hydroelectric energy in basins and wells that purifies the waters, the human autonomous energy heart that energetically purifies the blood for Henry's principle, finally, the hydroelectric car and the aerospace land transport vehicles that would not consume fuels, the interactive global engines that they would realize together Newton and Lorentz's thrust to navigate the atmosphere, space, and under the sea. All these inventions were not made not because they are contrary to the principles of energy conservation, but because they reveal the inability of public and private science to make interactive and global scientific and technological reasoning, which are the only ones that can allow the real progress. These are the reasons why global warming cannot be fought and at the same time nobody has put together a clean rational system that produces the thrust of Newton and Lorentz on board the means of transport. These thrusts must be based on a primary source of clean and powerful sustainable energy that is derived directly from the terrestrial effects of gravitational force, as the undersigned has shown.
I confirm that I am against the current industrial patent system, but probably this system can only be defeated by itself. As it allowed to develop a polluting, inefficient, uneconomical and corrupt global system. At the beginning of 2020, I filed these two important intellectual patent filings on land and sea aerospace transport. World authorities have almost a year to decide whether to continue protecting industrial property, or to demonstrate greater democracy and farsightedness by granting intellectual property and international copyrights to inventors and access to the making of inventions to all public companies and private interested. Obviously by regulating taxes differently and by demanding inventors the taxes on the rights actually received, not the maintenance fees of the patents that have never found financiers, because governments allow to build and sell fixed and mobile systems that do not close the cycles that open.
Since the current laws allow only one year to transform a national patent into an international one, the undersigned, right now, asks the few people in the world, who believe in interactive energies, to raise funds internationally, so that all the inventions of the undersigned , presented on the website http://www.spawhe.eu, which are now nobody's, since nobody has financed and implemented them, including the most recent ones, are considered to be the industrial property of an international joint-stock company, which will call "SPAWHE SPA" If this proposal of mine finds enough consensus to be implemented, it will replace the undersigned legally on all the rights acquired on the patents still in existence and on the expired ones that could be renewed and reported internationally, respecting the existing rules. Personally, as an inventor, I will not claim positions in this company and I will not be a shareholder, having no money to invest. If this initiative is successful, and my inventions will work and produce profits, I will be given royalties that will replace copyright.
I think this solution is not a good solution, because no multinational company, no matter how powerful it may be, can supply interactive energy and purification requirements all over the world, with about forty patents filed. But it will have the advantage of breaking the state of inertia of the United Nations, governments, multinationals and even environmental associations that protest but do not propose solutions. Today those who protest, without engaging in alternative designs, only ask for more funding in favor of those who have already produced global warming without identifying the interactive energies that would protect the environment, which also include the fuel-free terrestrial and aerospace transport systems published since 2016 and updated with these last two patent filings of 2020.
What will happen to the funds raised by SPAWHE S.P.A. if the United Nations, through W.I.P.O. (world intellectual property organization), reform their unfair system, separating intellectual property from industrial property at least for patents of public social utility (energy, purification, health)?
I don't think this will happen, since the United Nations and the international judges have never responded to twenty-five open letters from the undersigned, also sent to their public addresses. However, I think that SPAWHE S. P. A. can be achieved equally, with different objectives, equally important.
In fact, if the United Nations recognized the copyrights of inventors who produce inventions of public utility, the experimenters of such inventions would also be lacking in the world, since public bodies have shown not to collaborate with private inventors, preferring to collaborate only with multinationals who buy their patents. SPAWHE S.P. A. could become a private company that makes prototypes of inventors that are not financed by public bodies and multinationals, sharing 50% of their copyright or industrial property rights with the inventors, in the case of the sale of patents. I would be the first client of SPAWHE S.P.A. because I'm sure that even with the recognition of copyright to inventors, multinationals and public bodies will continue not to collaborate, having too many interests in common on current non-interactive inventions. In fact, if the United Nations recognized the copyrights of inventors who produce inventions of public utility, the experimenters of such inventions would also be lacking in the world, since public bodies have shown not to collaborate with private inventors, preferring to collaborate only with multinationals who buy their patents. SPAWHE S.P. A. could become a private company that makes prototypes of inventors that are not financed by public bodies and multinationals, sharing 50% of their copyright or industrial property rights with the inventors, in the case of the sale of patents. I would be the first client of SPAWHE S.P.A. because I'm sure that even with the recognition of copyright to inventors, multinationals and public bodies will continue not to collaborate, having too many interests in common on current non-interactive inventions
Few people know that the inventors of public and multinational corporations already own the rights to share industrial property (not intellectual property). But only public bodies sell patents, while multinationals buy. In fact, when a public body sells a patent to a multinational company, the proceeds are divided by law to 50% between the inventors and the organization they belong to. Few people know that the inventors of public and multinational corporations already own the rights to share industrial property (not intellectual property). But only public bodies sell patents, while multinationals buy. In fact, when a public body sells a patent to a multinational company, the proceeds are divided by law to 50% between the inventors and the organization they belong to. The undersigned is also invited to international conferences as a speaker to illustrate his inventions, and being his inventions transversal to different sectors, he is invited to conferences on recycling, purification, renewable energy, medicine, agriculture, chemistry, the biology, transport, but does not participate in having to pay the living and travel expenses alone. While taxpayers pay these expenses to public inventors, they also pay wages to produce inventions useful to humanity and the environment. Not simply inventions useful to multinationals that want to replace heat engines very slowly with battery-powered cars which are another palliative compared to interactive energy which needs neither fuels nor batteries, because energy can be produced in any corner of the Earth and space at the same instant it serves Until now, my invention most requested by the organizers of the congresses has been "the artificial heart oxygenator of the blood", which has been considered perpetual motion by the Italian patent office. However, even this invention has not found financiers, because multinationals do not make inventions that go against their commercial interests regardless of the existence of a patent. They probably prefer to sell pacemakers, as other multinationals prefer to sell oil, others the current pumps, petrol or battery cars, others the current planes, the current boats and ships with heat engines, the current agricultural tractors. It is possible that statesmen and public legislators, including those of patents, which depend directly on the United Nations, together with international judges, do not realize that with their laws, which protect the industrial property and trade of public patents towards multinationals, do they stimulate opposing interests to those of a sustainable economy?
These internationally legalized conflicts of interest cannot be fought unless interactive and transparent inventions and companies such as SPAWHE S.P.A. that finance the demonstration prototypes, which the public bodies, not doing their duty, ignore with the consent of the governments. What are the current rating agencies for, which give negative scores to indebted and inefficient countries? These are private companies that only protect capitalism and world stock exchanges. They have not noticed that since the beginning of the industrial era we have mistaken the primary energy and purification sources and for the same reason world science has not been able to add the Lorentz's thrust to Newton's to conquer space.
It should be remembered that the abbreviation SPAWHE, coined by myself in 2014, means Synergic Plants, Artificial Welling, Hydroelectric Energy, today it should be extended by including the inventions developed and published after 2014, but the word Synergic already indicates the exploitation of interactive systems that world public and private science has underestimated. I cannot modify all the written and published articles bearing this abbreviation, nor can I specify that the word hydroelectric refers to compressed hydroelectric with the recycling of water which has nothing to do with current hydroelectric power plants which, like the thermal and nuclear energy, they only produced disasters.
I think my inventor activity ended with these latest inventions. I also think that they are not all flour of my sack and that the study of these solutions has strengthened my faith in a superior entity that governs the world. The world is so perfect that none of our inventions can improve it. I believe that the task of the inventors enlightened by this faith in a higher entity is to correct all the wrong inventions of the past that do not close the cycles they open. By doing this work, inspired by natural systems and the laws of physics, I produced the sequence of protective inventions of the environment, which gradually allowed to bring together the thrusts of Newton and Lorentz, which not even NASA, dominated by thermal scientists and Nuclear has never managed to put together. My inventions are not only mine but also of the scientists of the past who have separately experimented very important laws, especially physical, on water, air, gravitational force, electromagnetism, which I was able to put together without funding, because the experiments have already made them. Physics does not need chemistry, thermodynamics and nuclear power to produce energy.
I have always said that I am a simple designer and installer of industrial and environmental systems. I only did the design work with the few means that allowed me my modest pension. I cannot also proceed with the installation of the systems, above all, due to the absence of institutional customers, especially regarding public utility systems. There was no point in participating in 2015 and 2018 in European social competitions because environmental and energy problems were not considered social by the examining boards. These competitions are authentic sweepstakes lottery ( http://www.spawhe.eu/the-european-social-innovation-competition-lottery/)
This is the summary of the latest invention that I propose.
The Italian patent filing no. 102020000000031 of 03/01/2020, entitled "aerospace and submarine transport system with primary and induced interactive global linear motors", although it is only an intellectual patent, allows us to touch first hand a very important advancement of the state of the art in systems of transport worldwide, as hydroelectric motors, also intellectual patents, have turned into linear motors, changing the shape and also the substance. In fact, the shape of these motors has become elongated cylindrical by incorporating the high pressure tank into the low pressure one, while the external walls of this have become sliding tracks of the permanent magnets, which are used to develop the induced currents. Therefore, an external solenoid was also added to the low pressure tank, so that this solenoid can also produce the Lorentz thrust. The aforementioned patent dealt with large aerospace means of transport, while in this the undersigned deals with small means of transport. Looking at figures 5, 6, 7 of a car of the future which represent the longitudinal and transverse sections, we can see that under the passenger compartment floor was installed in series with the interactive global linear motor and an electric turbofan, also equipped externally with sliding tracks and solenoid. Therefore, this group will simultaneously produce the thrust of Newton and Lorentz. In addition, it will be pivoted in the center and can tilt about 20 degrees. The four-wheel drive of the car, equipped with driving torque applied to the periphery of the wheel rims, will allow land transport, but they will be used above all to get the vehicles off the ground, which obviously, with the thrusts of Newton and Lorentz, will be able to rise from the common urban roads and fly into the atmosphere without using fuels. The overall thrust that will make the cars move in the Earth's atmosphere and in space will be due to the result of the horizontal and inclined one of Newton and Lorentz produced by the thrust group placed under the floor and by the vertical one of Lorentz, produced by the group placed at the interior of the passenger compartment. The plan size of the cars of the future will be the same as the current one but the shape will resemble the current minibuses, developing in height. To climb on them we will have to climb some steps. These cars, by changing the wheels, will also be able to work the land, being much more powerful than current agricultural tractors, thanks to the interactive energy between water, air and electromagnetism, which costs nothing. Obviously, if we use cars as agricultural tractors we will have to disable Newton's thrust which would raise too much dust. These cars will deactivate Newton's thrust and reinforce Lorentz's, even when used by the firefighters to stop permanently on fire outbreaks, transporting tanks full of water but externally equipped with permanent magnets and a solenoid that will produce the vertical thrust of Lorentz, to cancel the weight, balancing the weight force which is equal to "m x a" with the opposite force equal to "m x aL". The cars of the future can also be used to enjoy the sea and fish, quickly escaping the rough sea. Obviously, as for working the land, putting out fires, an accessory application will be needed. In fact, they can inflate two air cushions in flight on which they will rest on the water of the seas and lakes. These air cushions will serve to slide the car over the water and make it take off with the push of Newton and Lorentz. In flight, the cushions will deflate and roll up automatically in two special containers placed laterally to the global linear motor placed under the floor of the passenger compartment. Current cars are a waste of fuels and technologies that will never lead us to these interactive solutions because having the wrong primary source of energy, they cannot overcome the current state of the art. Only by demonstrating the technical and economic inefficiency of today's world energy systems, including batteries, will the current multinationals that govern and pollute the world be scrapped. But it is necessary that the oppositions also begin to understand interactive systems and so far, they have not understood them because those who govern and those who oppose attend the same schools of scientific training. They only diverge on political and social issues, while the problem is above all, scientific.
Luigi Antonio Pezone
Ci potete contattare al numero - contact us at the following telephone number:
39 0823 796712
39 340 5000 280
Potete usare il nostro modulo online. You can
use our online form
Per leggere o scaricare gli articoli, usare l'indice posto sopra l'immagine di apertura. Evidenziare il titolo e leggere l'articolo che appare sotto l'immagine al posto della Home Page.
To read or download the articles, use the index above the opening image. Highlight the title and read the article that appears below the image instead of the Home Page.
Luigi antonio Pezone