Artificial intelligence could be used for the common good due to the enormous computing power it enables, but currently the system only involves an immense extraction of resources as it is limited to managing existing inventions. Furthermore, I believe it will never be comparable to the natural intelligence of human beings, who unfortunately die along with the body. Of course, I am thinking especially of the great natural geniuses like Einstein, Pascal, Leonardo, Galileo, Newton, Lorentz, and many others. Artificial intelligence must never be separated from human rationality, with moral principles. If artificial intelligence were a real intelligence, it would have realized, as I have, that we can extract an immense amount of free hydroelectric energy from the sea and transport it to land through the invention of artificial welling, never realized by the very ruling class that proposes it. This could be combined with a vast collection of rainwater that falls into the sea and conveyed through underwater conduits made of PVC or polyethylene pipes, transforming current terrestrial deserts into gardens. Obviously carrying out all the necessary water distribution works.
The two systems together would be a true godsend, but planet Earth's ruling class doesn't understand this. Nor does it understand the other inventions of spawhe.eu (Synergic Plants Artificial Welling Hydroelectric Energy).
Everything on planet Earth has been designed to prevent global warming, but nothing has been achieved. It's all written down in black and white on the website https://spawhe.eu, starting with how smokestacks, sewer systems, water and air purifiers should be built, and how to better distribute the world's rainwater to eliminate deserts. We just need to stop global pollution and wars and start working seriously together, starting from a simple premise: we're all in the same small boat and we don't yet know if we're alone in the Universe. We should join forces, but instead we behave as if we were living in the 1400s, before the discovery of America and the basic aspects of astronomy that today make us understand that man is only a tiny creature in the immense universe.
All my life, I've been involved in industrial, technological, and environmental man-made systems, but only in retirement could I design them my way, without considering employers who would have forced me to comply with the usual specifications that have been flawed by public bodies and private companies in both fossil fuel and electricity generation. Unfortunately, the state of the art is so advanced that no one believed me, as I had no way to demonstrate it with demonstration prototypes.
My modest pension has been a drop in the ocean for public bodies and multinationals, especially in the field of water lifting and the production of submerged and compressed hydroelectric power without the usual hydraulic jump.
The terrestrial science that has warmed the planet has not yet grasped these inventions, which are now at least a decade old. These inventions also include the artificial heart, which oxygenates human blood and could extend human life.
If God had not intended for humans to live longer than other living beings, He would not have endowed us with the brain that allows us to produce all kinds of inventions, including prosthetics to survive workplace accidents and wars, produced by governments, and in some cases, even to compensate for certain congenital birth defects that today are resolved with natural organ transplants (in these cases, it is necessary to wait a long time to find the right organ, with a high risk of rejection and poor preservation of the natural organs). Personally, I think it is preferable to use proven replacement parts of the right size. I believe there is a very important, invisible organ: the soul, which is directly connected to the human brain. If it is true that man is made in the image of God, he must have another organ connected to the brain that distinguishes him from other living beings. I believe this organ is our natural heart, which beats faster when we experience strong feelings of love or fear. Unfortunately, our heart ages along with the body and is subject to malformations like other organs. It has a congenital defect: it must simultaneously feed the systemic and pulmonary circuits. Therefore, if one of the two circuits is originally defective or becomes ill, the person is subject to death, forcing the brain to die as well. For this reason, my artificial heart is equipped with a circulatory pump for each ventricle, which, as we know, are also connected in the natural heart. Unfortunately, this connection is useless in saving human life due to the lack of a second pump. I don't know why God did not provide a second pump, but as a designer of artificial heart systems, I believe it would be useful in defeating some serious diseases, especially old age. I don't think God will be offended if we make such a change to save or extend human life.
I was deeply moved by the Italian story of Domenico Caliendo, a happy and playful child waiting for a heart transplant, which turned tragic at the Monaldi Hospital in Naples due to the publicity surrounding an event that should be addressed with silence and prayer, given that it is a miracle of science that poses risks to the child's survival.
I take this opportunity to reiterate my energy-autonomous artificial heart, a human blood oxygenator, which has celebrated its tenth anniversary without institutional or private funding. This reiterates once again that our human heart is a weak link compared to our brain, which could certainly outlive our body. The reasons why my artificial heart was not funded are not religious, because I am convinced that if the human soul exists, it is in the human brain. God probably wanted to test our ability to survive with technology through a further invention. I am convinced that the reason why my artificial heart was not created is not religious.
It makes no sense to try to go into space with artificial intelligence while there are many wars and hunger on Earth. World governments should first solve the world's problems and then invest in space ventures. Artificial intelligence is not true intelligence, but something very different. In fact, computers perform calculations with programs memorized by humans, even though they are designed by humans. The inventions on spawhe.eu, on the other hand, are human and are the result of diverse experience and experimentation. The artificial heart, which oxygenates human blood, is a global invention donated by me to all of humanity, without profit and without much hope. However, it seems that humans don't like it. They prefer to continue selling pacemakers, just as they don't want the hydroelectric cars I proposed to continue selling oil. But oil would still be sold to make fertilizer and artificial welling, which could help us feed the world's population. How many inventions for peace on earth have never been realized? Just read the entire website https spawhe.eu to realize that not a single one has been realized.
But I think my artificial heart is being tested somewhere in the world anyway, at least to see if it actually works. In that case, my artificial heart will be reserved only for powerful men, not only out of selfishness, but above all to avoid proving that my method of generating energy, linked to the operation of the submerged and compressed hydroelectric system I have used everywhere in the years since, actually works. In fact, I have used this system to solve environmental and energy problems of all kinds. Even to eliminate deserts from planet Earth. It would be enough to read the last articles published before I stopped publishing due to health problems. This means that these inventions are linked to my modest person and my small website. With my death and the consequent closure of the website, the spawhe.eu system will also die. My inventions, having failed to find financiers, will never have existed.
All my doubts and the questions I have asked myself will remain unanswered. If it's true that God made us different from other living beings and granted us free will, it would also be right that, if necessary, we could replace our ailing natural heart with an artificial heart that oxygenates human blood, allowing our bodies to survive the sick and aging human body. Replacing the natural heart would increase survival rates from heart attacks and lung disease, and even allow us to survive better in future space adventures with less oxygen than is necessary with current physiology. These modifications don't mean that humans intend to replace God. God's greatness is infinite.
It's said that artificial intelligence will lead to unemployment because everything will be automated. I find this very strange because I've worked in industrial plants, the environment, and work organization. If these three sectors improve simultaneously, human living conditions should improve, unless governments fail to manage the wealth produced by humans. In this case, governments must change their profession because it is governments themselves who must manage the wealth produced, not entrepreneurs who must receive a fair profit from their work and not become the masters of planet Earth, as is happening due to governments that are unable to manage human inventions.
I'm excerpting from LinkedIn a portion of an article that appeared while I was writing this on June 15, 2026:
"Electric grid operators are asking a question that didn't exist five years ago: can you protect us from fifty megawatts per minute? This number represents the rate of change in load or production on the local grid. A single large data center dedicated to artificial intelligence can go from idle to maximum consumption in a matter of minutes, absorbing energy that would once have been enough to power an entire city district. A cloud passing over a solar plant can cause a loss of gigawatts of production in a matter of seconds—that's why energy storage via on-site batteries is now mandatory for grid stability. A fleet of electric vehicles simultaneously plugging into the grid after their commute can cause demand to spike faster than any conventional generation plant can react. When the grid is unable to absorb these fluctuations, it causes frequency sags, voltage drops, and, in the worst cases, cascading failures that cost billions. The problem doesn't arise on the Transmission line, where the grid has management tools. It occurs at the edges of distribution, in substations, industrial parks, and data center campuses, where only the busbar exists. The busbar is a passive copper or aluminum component located at the end of each distribution circuit and transports electrons from one point to another without judgment, intelligence, or awareness of what is happening around it. For much of the history of the American power grid, this system worked well. The old model was simple: large, centralized power plants generated electricity, transmission lines carried it long distances, and distribution networks delivered it to customers. Energy flowed in one direction. Demand was predictable. The grid was, essentially, a highly sophisticated hydraulic system, and the busbar simply did its job. That world no longer exists, and the busbar now finds itself at the center of a crisis it cannot comprehend.
With the proliferation of distributed energy resources across Europe—solar panels on rooftops, wind farms, battery storage systems, vehicles Electricity grid designers quickly realized that the old architecture was insufficient. Energy no longer flowed in one direction, but everywhere, from anyone, at any time. For this reason, Europe created the DSO (Distribution System Operator), a management layer that sits between the main transmission grid and the end customer. The DSO actively coordinates distributed generation, storage, and flexible load, balancing supply and demand in real time at the edge of the grid. It is the software layer that overlays the physical infrastructure. The United States never created this layer, and the reason is significant: the fragmented structure of American electric utilities, the tariff-based incentive model that rewards the construction of poles and cables rather than the optimization of what already exists, and decades of regulatory inertia in a system that worked well enough not to require change. The full consequences of this choice are now being revealed.
In the United States, there are ISOs and RTOs, regional transmission organizations that manage electricity flows across vast geographic areas. Between the ISO and the There's essentially nothing customer-centric. The distribution grid is managed by electric companies using tools and models designed for a centralized, unidirectional power system. The ISO detects volatility at the macro level and has tools to address the instability of power transmission. While the ISO monitors the grid, the collective bus remains immobile at the intersection, unaware of everything. The fifty megawatts-per-minute problem lies precisely in this gap, and nothing in the existing architecture is designed to fill it.
Batteries can help and are being deployed on a large scale. However, batteries degrade with use, are sensitive to temperature, and their response is not instantaneous. The grid also requires inertia at the edges, the same physical property that kept the old grid stable when large rotating turbines automatically absorbed frequency deviations. Flywheel technology reintroduces this inertia in a modern, distributed form. A flywheel stores kinetic energy in a rotating mass, responds in milliseconds, tolerates extreme ambient temperatures, and exhibits no curve. of degradation and is widely recyclable.
The development of AI requires reliable, high-quality power on a scale that existing distribution infrastructure was never designed to provide. Data center developers face years-long waiting lists for interconnections. The costs of grid upgrades are being passed on to consumers who had nothing to do with the surge in demand. The hidden cost of unreliability manifests itself in fuel bills for backup generators, equipment failures, and lost productivity in every industry that depends on a steady power supply—which is, increasingly, every industry. Regulators have been slow to act because the old model has worked so long that they haven't yet recognized the need for something new. Utilities have largely sidelined edge intelligence because their rate structures reward infrastructure investments, not optimization of what already exists. The LinkedIn article concludes this way.
| The development of AI requires reliable, high-quality power on a scale that existing distribution infrastructure was never designed to provide. Data center developers face years-long waiting lists for interconnections. The costs of grid upgrades are being passed on to consumers who had nothing to do with the surge in demand. The hidden cost of unreliability manifests itself in fuel bills for backup generators, equipment failures, and lost productivity in every industry that depends on a steady power supply—which is, increasingly, every industry. Regulators have been slow to act because the old model has worked so long that they haven't yet recognized the need for something new. Utilities have largely sidelined edge intelligence because their rate structures reward infrastructure investments, not optimization of what already exists. The LinkedIn article concludes this way. Another major threat to planet Earth is the melting of glaciers, which many billionaires see as a further opportunity to increase their wealth, while politicians reaffirm their ignorance by thinking about potential electoral consensus. Indeed, at high latitudes, trapped in the form of frozen ground, or permafrost, precious carbon reserves are found. Astute researchers have long been keeping an eye on these icy northern mountain ranges, where a reversal of the trend could trigger a vicious cycle of global warming if rising global temperatures release the trapped carbon. A new study should send shivers down scientists' spines: the permafrost feedback loop could begin before 2100. When modeling permafrost, researchers typically focus on the top few meters of soil, which are easier to sample. However, to gain a more complete picture, a team modeled how carbon present in soils below 3 meters of depth might have been trapped during the Pleistocene and Holocene. They then simulated how this carbon might be released under different global warming scenarios proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Under the two highest-emission scenarios, permafrost would transition from a carbon sink to a carbon source by the end of the century. |
Human logic must meet the logic of nature and economics for practical reasons. Transporting electricity over long distances is not viable unless it is natural energy. Battery-powered cars are not a solution if submerged and compressed hydroelectric power exists worldwide, because this is the only natural energy that responds to natural principles. Across our entire small planet, all freshwater, including rainwater collected from the oceans for artificial welling (which, like my other environmental inventions, has never been realized), must be rationally connected in the simplest and most linear way, according to the global state of the art of science and technology and the scientific organization of industrial work, as described elsewhere in this article. We cannot afford to absorb the electricity required by data centers and the environment itself without changing the terrestrial energy source (i.e., freshwater combined with the Earth's atmosphere). This is why we must restore the glaciers before it's too late. If artificial intelligence doesn't understand this, it's not very intelligent.
So improvised technological solutions must end. If God created water, air, and gravitational force, which are everywhere but not rationally connected to each other, it makes no sense to seek other, more expensive and less rational solutions. We need to find the right way to connect existing energy sources, which are sufficient. In particular, we need to better engage the world's freshwater resources, which cost nothing and are abundant. For this reason, after inventing submerged and compressed hydroelectric solutions in recent years, which failed to warm the hearts of environmental and energy entrepreneurs, I remembered my old artificial well project, which hadn't warmed the hearts of entrepreneurs or scientists either. I realized that all the issues are coming to a head, even though I continue to work without finding public and private partners interested in real investments that could simultaneously eliminate global poverty and global pollution. Meanwhile, it is said that artificial intelligence is already creating intellectual unemployment. It is clear that my reasoning, as a free man unconnected to any center of power, runs counter to that of today's multinationals. Governments, through free elections, must choose the peace solutions that the current leaders, not even the newspapers or the opposition, are not discussing. Only I, the undersigned, speak about them, and no one believes them because I am not tied to any power or global scientific organization, but only to my own direct experience, including small details that no one has wanted to practically test, so as not to change anything about the current way of producing the world's wealth.
It is not necessary to create other, more expensive and environmentally unfriendly energies, as we have done with heat engines and coal-fired steam boilers. Obviously, if coal is necessary, we must design good chimneys with electrostatic filters, as suggested on spawhe.eu.
Another reason why I became an inventor in my retirement was because I realized that the energy principles of water and air are not being exploited rationally, both locally and globally. Here too, governments should dictate the rules for designing human-powered facilities. But this doesn't happen because governments earn electoral support based on the jobs they create. They don't realize that by designing human-powered facilities globally, they would gain more votes. Politicians live day by day: better an egg today than a chicken tomorrow. They should know the state of the art in each sector to prevent entrepreneurs from abusing their power and speculating. As we know, every entrepreneur is a man of his own making. If legislation isn't adequate, the environment cannot be protected. In my resume, I talk very little about the time I worked in the automotive industry and much more about the time I worked in the environmental sector because I wanted to highlight the mistakes made by entrepreneurs who, instead of designing man-made systems that protect the environment, design and build systems that absorb all types of energy, and energy storage systems that draw energy from electricity distribution networks. So, the leopard may change its spots but not its vices. Entrepreneurs don't want energy savings; they want to sell energy, including energy storage systems. Natural energy that costs nothing and no one wants to sell. For this reason, public bodies should design and sell the world's energy. Today, however, public bodies play a double game. Instead of promoting inventions of public utility that always benefit the environment, they ignore them, and inventors like myself, who are not funded by multinationals, because they produce inventions of public utility that are not very commercial.
This is the reason why my solutions have not found a counterpart. Saving money is not considered an economic gain. Governments should be the ones to convince entrepreneurs that profits can be made by building public works that extract clean energy from the environment. This requires alternative inventions that represent a different way of designing man-made plants, as I have unsuccessfully attempted with the entire SPAWHE system, which failed to find public and private stakeholders interested in investing in the SPAWHE system's solutions, which would have extracted clean energy directly from the environment. Obviously, a different way of designing man-made plants is needed, and this requires a culture that cannot be improvised. For this reason, I began with the sewers and smokestacks, the purification plants, which must be different from the current ones, as illustrated in the spawhe.eu drawings.
In fact, submerged and compressed hydroelectric energy can be extracted directly from the environment without fuels and polluting emissions because the production process is direct and immediate, desired by the Creator of the Universe, without the intermediaries of governments and multinationals. Given my experience in industrial, environmental, and work organization plants, I found it natural to offer my opinion on the correct way to design human-generated systems, particularly those that treat water and air, which are the most common. Or should be. I couldn't help but offer my opinion on how such systems are designed, and I dabbled in inventing a few (about forty, unfunded by any government or multinational).
My inventions also include the hydroelectric car, the artificial well, the artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, but above all, the correct way to extract energy from the environment, the correct way to design industrial smokestacks, and sewer systems interspersed with sludge sedimentation tanks and oxygenators to prevent acidification. Unfortunately, my systems were never built. This shows that it's not just wars that claim innocent victims. There's something wrong with the entire global ruling class, because schools don't teach that all open cycles must be perfectly closed. Current heat engines would never have been invented if hydroelectric cars had come first, along with step-lifting under gravitational force; the submerged and compressed hydroelectric system; pumps with dual power supplies separated up to the impeller. Unfortunately, these inventions don't exist due to the lack of funding, especially public funding. Because it should have been public bodies that sought these solutions. Consequently, the artificial heart, which could extend human life simply by using two pumps instead of one, doesn't exist either.
I found myself faced with significant moral and economic contradictions that those who do my job installing anthropogenic systems are unlikely to avoid, given the fact that they rarely manage industrial and environmental systems simultaneously, and rarely work in retirement, to delve into the issues even from a moral perspective, moreover without being paid by anyone. This is how I transformed myself into a full-time inventor, losing money to pay patent filing fees, which shouldn't be paid on projects of public utility.
Of course, I never paid patent maintenance fees, but I continued working anyway until I suffered a stroke in July 2025, which caused significant motor and cerebral slowing. Now that I have partially recovered from the tragic event, I think it's right to mention this experience as well, since in my current state of health, my work should be continued by other designers with greater financial resources and in better physical and intellectual condition who share my solutions both technically and morally. In fact, I believe climate issues are fundamental for the designers of human-made facilities. Humans have a duty not to adapt to all the climatic conditions that can be created on earth with the help of science, technology, politics, governments, and opposition.
The recent controversy between the American president and the Holy Father of the Catholic Church highlights that God is watching us closely and that we must ask ourselves where these godless, powerful men want to go with nuclear science, the results of which we have gained from the World War and from equally dangerous nuclear power plants. We have talented scientists who have stopped at the excitation of atoms, achieving excellent technical and scientific results in the medical and energy fields without resorting to splitting the atom. As for fossil fuels, there are valid purification systems, some of which I have even studied. Other solutions can still be found and tested.
As a common Catholic citizen, I believe that if God allowed me to invent the energy-autonomous artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, published in several scientific journals, it would have been right to also find the financial funding to test this invention, which serves not only to extend human life beyond all expectations. Above all, it serves to demonstrate that humanity, thanks be to God, can indeed find solutions that science cannot find on its own. Religion must be interpreted more openly than the Christian gospel, which cannot continue to recount the Old and New Testaments without recognizing that both are overtaken by daily events. The world's powerful have always destroyed human lives too easily in the name of the interests of individual countries, without considering that we have acquired the knowledge to understand that planet Earth is just a small grain of sand compared to the universe. Therefore, it would be logical for us all to live in peace without weapons of destruction and without pollution. Everything that harms the planet also harms us and our children, no matter where we live on Earth.
As an installer of terrestrial industrial and environmental man-made systems, I have learned that it is very difficult to find impartial solutions that serve everyone's interests. For this reason, I began my career as an inventor in retirement without being paid by anyone. Unfortunately, I didn't find
I naively thought that energy extracted directly from the environment would cost nothing, except for the energy's transportation infrastructure, which doesn't exist. In fact, floods occur due to the lack of such infrastructure, in which no country invests, or at least invests sufficiently. Without infrastructure, even fossil fuel production isn't possible. But fossil fuel infrastructure was created with the commercial value of fuels in mind. I believe that the value of the submerged and compressed energy that I have stubbornly extracted from the environment, likely with God's help, is far greater than that of fossil fuels because it is a clean and abundant energy that only requires the construction of infrastructure by humans in every country around the world. Infrastructure isn't complex.
The SPAWHE (Synergic Plants Artificial Welling Hydroelectric Energy) system is linked to real-world industrial and environmental experiences on Earth. Space solutions within the Earth's atmosphere have also been hypothesized. These can only be fantasy, as space is a very hostile environment for humans. But today, thanks to the large telescopes of Hubble and especially James Webb, science has begun to understand something. What is better understood is that earthlings must make the best investments on Earth. In the sense that we must avoid all of this, especially climatically and biologically, for the sake of our descendants and ourselves, given that life can be much longer than it is now thanks to the artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, especially if we find the cultural and emotional motivations to live like old people. Youth was a gift from God. The rest is all science and technology. It used to be said that up to the age of ninety, there was always something to learn. With the artificial heart, mechanical prostheses, and new medicines, lifespan could easily double if we are content to live like old people.
How many things could be accomplished with the help of artificial intelligence if it were truly intelligent and not fueled by oil and nuclear energy. Unfortunately, today we have no choice because billionaires govern, drawing their power from the current energy system that has warmed the planet. I hope the billionaires will become enlightened because they have an IQ far above average.
As an ordinary Catholic, I believe that if God allowed me to invent the energy-autonomous artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, published in several scientific journals, it would have been right to find the financial funding to test this invention, which serves not only to extend human life beyond all expectations. Above all, it serves to demonstrate that indeed, man, thanks be to God, can find solutions that science cannot find on its own. Religion must be interpreted more openly than the Christian gospel, which cannot continue to recount the Old and New Testaments without recognizing that both are overtaken by daily events. Earth's powerful have always destroyed human lives too easily in the name of the interests of individual countries, without taking into account that we have acquired the knowledge to understand that wars harm everyone and rarely end. Therefore, it would be logical for everyone to live in peace without weapons of destruction and without pollution. Everything that harms the planet also harms us, no matter what country we live in.
As an installer of terrestrial industrial and environmental man-made systems, I have learned that it is very difficult to find impartial solutions that serve everyone's interests. The most commercially successful solutions are not the best. For this reason, I began my career as an inventor in retirement. Unfortunately, I couldn't find partners willing to invest in my solutions, born from environmental and industrial experience, but with energy extracted directly from the environment, which would cost nothing, apart from the non-existent energy transport infrastructure. In fact, floods occur due to the lack of such infrastructure, in which no country invests sufficiently.
Unfortunately, even on paper, solutions don't all emerge at once. They are the result of successive considerations. Indeed, if we had implemented all of SPAWHE's solutions, the state-of-the-art systems and related infrastructure would have improved. Unfortunately, in this sector, many talk, but few propose concrete solutions. Indeed, moving from step-lifting water to compressing it is a state-of-the-art advancement that no one has noticed because no one on planet Earth has implemented it. These solutions can only be found on the website of a retired person not funded by any public body in the world. Therefore, we should not be surprised if even artificial intelligence makes mistakes. Intelligence lacks human creativity, but neither does it possess human malice. If guided, it can detect the immense environmental errors committed by humans.
Regarding human physiology, the question we must ask ourselves without hypocrisy is this: is it better to live in a human body modified by humans to extend human life, or to accept the current limitations? I was forced to ask myself this question due to the absence of public and private interlocutors who have never asked themselves this question, given the absence of the energetically autonomous human blood oxygenating artificial heart invented by the undersigned, which has never been financed.
The SPAWHE (Synergic Plants Artificial Welling Hydroelectric Energy) system is linked to real-world industrial and environmental experiences on Earth. Space solutions within the Earth's atmosphere have also been hypothesized. These can only be fantasy, as space is a very hostile environment for humans. But today, thanks to the large telescopes of Hubble and especially James Webb, science has begun to understand something. What is better understood is that earthlings must make the best investments on Earth. In the sense that we must avoid all of this, especially climatically and biologically, for the sake of our descendants and ourselves, given that life can be much longer than it is now thanks to the artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, especially if we find the cultural and emotional motivations to live like old people. Youth was a gift from God. The rest is all science and technology. It used to be said that up to the age of ninety, there was always something to learn. With the artificial heart, mechanical prostheses, and new medicines, lifespan could easily double if we are content to live like old people.
How many things could be accomplished with the help of artificial intelligence if it were truly intelligent and not fueled by oil and nuclear energy. Unfortunately, today we have no choice because billionaires govern, drawing their power from the current energy system that has warmed the planet. I hope the billionaires will become enlightened because they have an IQ far above average.
As an ordinary Catholic, I believe that if God allowed me to invent the energy-autonomous artificial heart that oxygenates the blood, published in several scientific journals, it would have been right to find the financial funding to test this invention, which serves not only to extend human life beyond all expectations. Above all, it serves to demonstrate that indeed, man, thanks be to God, can find solutions that science cannot find on its own. Religion must be interpreted more openly than the Christian gospel, which cannot continue to recount the Old and New Testaments without recognizing that both are overtaken by daily events. Earth's powerful have always destroyed human lives too easily in the name of the interests of individual countries, without taking into account that we have acquired the knowledge to understand that wars harm everyone and rarely end. Therefore, it would be logical for everyone to live in peace without weapons of destruction and without pollution. Everything that harms the planet also harms us, no matter what country we live in.
As an installer of terrestrial industrial and environmental man-made systems, I have learned that it is very difficult to find impartial solutions that serve everyone's interests. The most commercially successful solutions are not the best. For this reason, I began my career as an inventor in retirement. Unfortunately, I couldn't find partners willing to invest in my solutions, born from environmental and industrial experience, but with energy extracted directly from the environment, which would cost nothing, apart from the non-existent energy transport infrastructure. In fact, floods occur due to the lack of such infrastructure, in which no country invests sufficiently.
Unfortunately, even on paper, solutions don't all emerge at once. They are the result of successive considerations. Indeed, if we had implemented all of SPAWHE's solutions, the state-of-the-art systems and related infrastructure would have improved. Unfortunately, in this sector, many talk, but few propose concrete solutions. Indeed, moving from step-lifting water to compressing it is a state-of-the-art advancement that no one has noticed because no one on planet Earth has implemented it. These solutions can only be found on the website of a retired person not funded by any public body in the world. Therefore, we should not be surprised if even artificial intelligence makes mistakes. Intelligence lacks human creativity, but neither does it possess human malice. If guided, it can detect the immense environmental errors committed by humans.
Regarding human physiology, the question we must ask ourselves without hypocrisy is this: is it better to live in a human body modified by humans to extend human life, or to accept the current limitations? I was forced to ask myself this question due to the absence of public and private interlocutors who have never asked themselves this question, given the absence of the energetically autonomous human blood oxygenating artificial heart invented by the undersigned, which has never been financed.
The war in Ukraine, which has been going on for over four years, is demonstrating that small drones can defeat powerful aircraft carriers; expensive tanks have become useless. But even drones can be stopped by simple fishermen's nets. Therefore, world wars primarily serve to waste economic resources, inflict military and civilian casualties, and increase the number of disabled civilians and soldiers. If submerged and compressed hydroelectric power had existed, Ukrainians and the world's population would not even have suffered from the cold, being able to produce energy autonomously and locally using only water and air. This would apply to the entire planet Earth. As mentioned, the entire planet could be cooled and heated with submerged and compressed hydroelectric power, which could eliminate all the world's deserts. Artificial wells would produce fish year-round, while marine rainwater transported by underwater pipelines would strengthen freshwater reserves. Obviously, investments are needed that the ruling class fails to grasp, despite artificial intelligence. Freshwater collected from the sea would also help prevent forest fires, of which there are many. With such an abundance of water and atmospheric air that costs nothing, we as humans should be ashamed to suffer from the current problems. We should also be ashamed that global warming during the summer months, due to droughts, is causing salty seawater to seep into the plains through dry rivers, completely ruining agriculture, already in crisis due to the high cost of fuel, for the simple fact that no world government has wanted to experiment with submerged and compressed energy without the hydraulic jump, which would cost almost nothing. Reflecting on the industrial and energy development they have created. Not all inventions have been useful to humanity. Most have been misguided because they have caused more environmental harm than benefit. Selection must be made before it's too late to prevent further damage to the planet. Everything that heats and pollutes the planet must be eliminated after verifying that the SPAWHE system actually works and is also the least expensive. Then we will consider the space race with solutions that don't harm the Earth. Otherwise, it's not worth it. We are only human beings. We are not Gods.
What do you think about artificial intelligence, the latest powerful invention created by billionaires?
Luigi Antonio Pezone
