Dear President Meloni, to you who are preparing to participate at the highest levels at the G8, G20 and C0P (Conference of the Parties) summits, I would like to point out the modest considerations of the undersigned, who has experienced industrial environmental and energy problems at the forefront, as a designer, installer, inventor of anthropogenic systems in the last fifty-three years. Unfortunately, my interactive environmental and energy inventions, which have occupied the last sixteen years of my life, have not been understood by world science, politicians and entrepreneurs. For myself, the planet Earth is not yet ready to be administered by politicians and economists. First he has to solve huge scientific problems that cannot be solved with the current science that has always worked in watertight compartments, with mono-disciplinary experiments and applications, completely neglecting the multidisciplinary, interactive, self-purifying and self-energetic principles that Earth nature applies for four, five billion years, transforming the earth’s primordial environment into the present one without the help of any technology. Certainly, four, five billion years is a very long time because nature takes a long time to purify the environment. But the terrestrial industrial age, of only 150 years, was so quick to ruin the environment that politicians and economists cannot manage it. Nor can they trust the real responsible for environmental degradation, which are not the individual branches of science, but those who prevent, in one way or another, that science is applied globally, without changing natural physical, chemical, biological processes. Science and technology should only locally increase the speed of natural processes, without altering them. It is not easy to grasp this concept on the part of world governments that continue to consult individual academic experts from the various branches of science in the face of alluvial, cyclonic calamities, great fires. The situation is much more complex and concerns the entire world labor organization, which must not open chemical cycles that cannot close perfectly and if it is necessary to open them, it is also necessary to create the infrastructures and anthropogenic plants capable of closing these cycles. This is a fairly simple problem to solve in fixed anthropogenic plants, however science has not solved it. It becomes very complex in mobile anthropic systems, which concern, above all, means of transport, terrestrial, marine, submarine, air and space. Obviously, in the whole world, no one has any idea how to solve the problems of pollution produced by mobile plants. In the meantime, in this short industrial period, following a logarithmic curve much more accelerated over time, the waters of the oceans have acidified by more than 30% and the melting of glaciers in the last 30 years has seen the annual loss increase by 800 billion tons. to 1,300 billion tons. This means that the energy and purification systems designed by men are not suitable for the Earth environment. For these reasons, in my opinion, at least, the United Nations should have been, above all, a political and scientific body at the same time, in order to develop at least impartial multi-disciplinary demonstrative prototypes to be made available to all terrestrial countries. In fact, all the countries of the planet Earth need concrete examples of energy and technological purification applications, valid both from an industrial, environmental and economic point of view. Unfortunately, the United Nations Organization is only a political and bureaucratic body that has never set itself the task of coordinating even the science that has continued to be developed in a mono-disciplinary way, at the service of those who pay it best. Even today, public scientific bodies sell their patents to multinationals in individual industrial sectors. It is quite obvious that multinationals only buy patents in line with their industrial production line which has produced an unequal distribution of world wealth and global warming. In this serious global context, the undersigned, as a simple employee designer and installer of systems, first in large industry (Alfa Romeo) and then in a small company specialized in environmental, purification and energy subcontracts, for a total of thirty-seven years realized the difficulties that public and private scientists and researchers, specialized in individual sectors, find in understanding the problems globally, but also in escaping the laws of the labor market and the wishes of employers. For these reasons, since 2006, it has autonomously started the study of environmental protection and sustainable energy based on interactive synergistic principles, which, starting from the gravitational force, exploit, above all, those of Pascal, Henry, Dalton, l ‘impenetrability of bodies, inorganic chemistry, biochemistry, photo synthesis and the universal carbon cycle. brevetti nazionali e internazionali, ho potuto sviluppare soltanto impianti virtuali. Unfortunately, having never had a loan and having to incur only expenses to file national and international patents, I was able to develop only virtual systems. It goes without saying that no government and no multinational has ever financed these solutions. What is worse: no one has ever provided an explanation, starting with the Italian public scientists of ENEA, CNR, various universities. Even the Draghi government did not reply to two open letters (, ). In these letters I criticized, above all, the ecological transition that even would like to use the new nuclear, while the very Italian inventions of the undersigned, based on interactive principles, were not even taken into consideration I hope that your right-wing government, which always recites the phrase “Italians first”, will use this slogan even in terms of good Italian inventions, before putting their hands in the pockets of Italians to pay the energy bills resulting from the inventions copied by the abroad, which have produced pollution and global warming and today also produce the speculations of energy producers and traders. Unfortunately, the whole world is country. It is ridiculous that Earth citizens have to pay expensive electricity bills, when this energy could be extracted everywhere in fixed and mobile plants. At the most we should pay the cost of the technological components for the construction of the systems in a workmanlike manner, so that they do not produce pollution in the surrounding environment. The instructions for building and assembling fixed and mobile systems should be provided free of charge to the entire world population, above all, through multidisciplinary scientific school education. Not the current one which, divided into mono-disciplinary scientific faculties, has produced mono-disciplinary industries and anthropic plants, which today no one wants to change for reasons of specific interests, which are destroying the planet.

My sixteen years of retirement during which I transformed myself from designer and installer of industrial and environmental anthropogenic plants into an inventor, were characterized by a long war with the Italian and European patent offices that defined my inventions as “perpetual motion”, therefore contrary to the principles of energy conservation. The thing is very strange since the world’s major astrophics (including the late Stephen Watkins), assert that the total energy of the universe is equal to zero. I agree with this thesis, but what these scientists do not say is the fact that this energy is not equally distributed in the universe. In some and rare cases, due to fortunate astrophysical circumstances (optimal distances between stars and energy sources such as the sun and satellites), in small or large planets, after several billion years, thanks to particular electromagnetic conditions and gravitational forces, it is created biological life, with water, atmospheric air, forests, glaciers, and above all, animals, including intelligent beings such as humans. It should be obvious that in these privileged planets, there is an excess of accumulated energy, compared to the universal vacuum. If the scientists and inventors of these planets had known how to do their job well, they would have understood how it is possible to extract energy from the environment in a painless way for the environment itself. I think this is the time to speak out on planet Earth at least, before the wrong inventions destroy the planet itself. I’m not just talking about my inventions. I could not have done anything without the work of many great scientists, including, mainly, Newton, Einstein, Tesla, Lorentz, Pascal, Henry, but also the Italians, Torricelli and Venturi and the unknown Erone Alessandrino, who even in 1592 invented the first centrifugal pump with axial suction and radial delivery. Over the centuries, these pumps have improved a lot technologically, yet no one has ever noticed that if we don’t use them to lift water they can be used to extract electricity from the environment. It is sufficient to make them pump in the direction of the gravitational force, obviously placing them in series with the turbines.

My compressed hydroelectromagnetic energy with water recycling that uses the compressed air used statically as an energy source, comes from an in-depth study of submerged hydroelectric plants, in which an inverted submersible pump, which pumps downwards, and a turbine. Both are inserted in a water drop pipe that starts from the top of the water containment basin. This system behaves like an under head system with endless recycling of water in a system that can be defined as an “open vessel”. In these simple systems, the hydrostatic head, measured in meters of water column, is chosen after having carefully calculated the head losses in the turbine and in the pipes, to place the pump and the turbine at the depth required for the amount of energy to be to produce. The positive head on the pump to be kept constant over time represents the natural energy engine. The pump only has the task of overcoming the state of inertia of the water inside the descent pipe that feeds both the pump and the turbine. Il consumo energetico della pompa è bassissimo in quanto la pompa è posizionata tra due carichi idraulici uguali e contrari, uno interno al tubo di discesa e uno esterno. The rotation of the pump, placed in these conditions, produces in the entire above water column, the descent of the water separated from the surrounding static waters, with a pressure (m * g * h) and kinetic energy (1/2 * m * V2), which are used in the turbine to produce energy. Assuming that the overall efficiency of the turbine and coupled current generator is 0.8. The useful power that can be delivered by a turbine that fully exploits the payload Hu, assumed to be 50 m, with a ducted pump having a flow rate of 1 m3 / s, will be Pu = η * 1000 * Q * Hu / 102 = 0.8 * 1000 * 1 * 50/102 = 392 KW; while to rotate the pump in the conditions of equilibrium between the positive head and the turbine, a head of a few cm of water column is enough. Assuming you are working with an electric pump that has the same flow rate, head 0.2 and efficiency 0.7, the absorbed power is 2.8 KW (1000 * 0.2 / 102 * 0.7). The ratio between energy produced and expenditure is 392 / 2.8 = 140. In reality, we do not have a plant that absorbs 2.8 kWh and one that produces 392. We have only one plant that produces 392 kWh, which consumes only 2.8 kWh, to trigger and keep the entire energy process triggered. When we interrupt the pump power supply, the whole system stops and we have zero energy production. In essence we could say that by putting together a downwardly oriented pump and turbine in series in a tube within a basin or other larger sized tube that acts as a basin, we can extract electrical energy infinitely from the environment without fuel. It is as if we had primed a siphon by extracting the air from a tube immersed in a tank that allows the tank to be emptied without any energy consumptionThe example of the very simple siphon triggered by a simple depression should have made science understand that it has many other scientific principles, already identified: pressostatic, fluid dynamic, electromagnetic, which triggered at the same time, today could allow us to purify and produce energy at the same time without the use of fire and explosions that can only be useful in wars, not in the creative designs of earthly life.

The example of the siphon only shows that atmospheric pressure can raise water up to ten meters high in a closed pipe emptied of atmospheric air. Clearly, it is closely related to the gravitational force. If we suppose that the gravitational force of the earth was double or triple the current one, we must deduce that the water in a siphon would also rise, approximately, not ten but twenty or thirty meters. This means that it would be even easier to extract energy from the environment and purify water without energy costs. Obviously, we humans and animals were meant to live with the current atmospheric pressure, we would be very different from how we are now. What I mean is the fact that all the interactive solutions that I have conceived and patented purify and extract energy from the environment by locally increasing the operating pressures of the anthropic purification and energy plants, fixed and mobile, and the consequent proposed changes concerning the way of working of pumps, turbines, autoclaves, and modifications to the pumps themselves which in many cases should have a separate double power supply up to the impeller, are scientifically correct, even if they have been regularly boycotted by science, by entrepreneurs, by patent offices, and by world politicians who today are asking all world citizens to make enormous sacrifices to face rising energy costs. As I wrote in the article “A global corporation against the errors of omissions and opportunities wasted by science and world power centers”, patents of public utility should be exempt from paying any tax other than that of deposit in the country of origin. The burden of experimentation should be borne by the country of the inventors, to which the other countries, which will benefit from it, should recognize international copyrights. Part of these rights should be vested in the inventors. In the absence of governments capable of understanding the need to develop patents of public social utility, world citizens themselves should create special joint stock companies that bear the burdens of world public utility trials. Unfortunately, neither governments nor world citizens have shared my proposal and we continue to live in a world that makes no difference between social and commercial inventions. The first no one patents them because to be of public utility they should be impartial and interactive, the commercial ones, on the other hand, are booming, because even public scientists work to sell commercial patents to multinationals. What are we complaining about if today in addition to having to face global warming and equally global pollution, we also have to face the enormous costs of energy? Where is the real science and where is the real politics? (

I am very sorry that these things should be written by a simple industrial expert, and not by higher science. The one most awarded by the Nobels, who prefers to continue studying the division of the atom thinking about universal energy, while the energy contained in the simplest and most useful molecules, produced and refined in billions of years by terrestrial nature, as they are, already could allow us to painlessly and cost-effectively extract energy from the environment. Faced with this simple scientific truth of submerged hydroelectric energy, which no one has exploited worldwide, despite the fact that the undersigned has communicated it since 2014, I wonder who should we be afraid of? Of bad science? Or of the various powers that by mutual agreement make bad scientific information, to continue producing wrong energies, ignoring the most elementary scientific energy and purifying principles? It is not true that the water cannot escape from the submerged turbine due to the hydrostatic head of the water in the containment basin. By intubating the water from the surface of the basin and inserting the pump and the turbine in this pipe, we produce a kinetic energy independent of the static waters of the basin or reservoir containing the system. Therefore the water at the exit of the turbine undergoes a resistance equal to a simple subdued outlet which in all world scientific documentation has always been calculated based on the exit speed with the following formula V2 / 2g, which has nothing to do with the hydrostatic head. No one has ever thought of being able to produce energy with such low infrastructural investments, drawing from static energy sources such as atmospheric pressure and hydrostatic height on the pumps placed in series with the turbines, as long as they are powered autonomously from above the basins. This simple energy provided for free by nature that I called submerged energy, on planet Earth no one has ever understood it, but my later inventions with the modified pumps with the double separate power supply up to the impeller that would have allowed us to use were not understood. over and over again the same water to produce energy in fixed and mobile systems. I can understand the scientific ignorance of politicians, trade unionists, economists, world entrepreneurs. But I cannot understand the ignorance of the scientists and professors who are still silent on this subject despite global warming and rising energy costs, while the Italian and European patent offices have declared my solutions perpetual motion. Despite the global silences collected, the deepening of these inventions and their rational connection allowed me to identify pressostatic and depressive hydrodynamic phenomena that allowed me to trigger artificial interactive processes to extract energy from the terrestrial environment and to purify the water using only the air and gravitational force as a source of energy, without spending money to extract fuels from the ground, transport them, refine them, or even money to create the infrastructures for transporting the energy produced. This is why I assert that clean energy on planet Earth is everywhere and current technologies, with small changes already extensively described in previous articles, would allow us to free ourselves from those who, believing themselves to be the absolute masters of energy sources and technologies, allow themselves to blackmail all world governments.

Anyone who, like myself, has participated in the construction of many hydraulic lifting systems (just read my curriculum knows that the world energy expenditure for these systems is enormous. In large lifting stations, pumps with flow rates of several hundred liters per second are used and motors are fed several hundred kWh at a voltage of 6,000 or 10,000 volts to reduce costs, weights and dimensions of the systems. Reflecting as a retiree, I realized that these systems are also wrong, with an immense waste of materials, technology and above all, energy, without anyone ever noticing anything. Anyone who knows Pascal’s principle knows that the waters could also be raised with the autoclaves alone without consuming the compressed air; while Henry’s principle alone would be enough to dissolve the oxygen contained in the compressed air in the water, purifying it. Yet we waste electricity to raise the water with pumps and to introduce compressed air produced by the compressors into air diffusers in the oxidation basins. We consume electricity unnecessarily and produce it at high costs with fuels that pollute the environment that we do not know how to purify, just because we do not know how to use the synergies that would allow the various scientific principles to work simultaneously. It is no coincidence that SPAWHE means: Sinergic Plants Artificial Wellinge Hydroelectromagnetic Energy. Unfortunately, this acronym has never entered any world school because it represents a completely alternative development model to the current one dominated by multinationals and scientists who continue to exploit single disciplines and single energy sources for the sole fact that there are no impartial multidisciplinary scientific supervisors. The current world politicians, even if they were honest, could not simultaneously correct science and the world entrepreneurs who collaborate with each other to keep the various specializations separate. In no world school has anyone ever taught how to rationally and coherently put together scientific principles and technologies impartially. It is no coincidence that even the Nobel prizes continue to be awarded to those who discover new individual inventions, that while useful, they cannot change previous wrong inventions. World scientific institutions have never rewarded those who have tried to put them together rationally by making a selection between mono-disciplinary and multidisciplinary inventions, because the multidisciplinary and interactive ones have never been funded otherwise we would not have the current sewers, chimneys, purifiers, thermal and nuclear power plants. This shows that man-made plants are all wrong and therefore, the entire current economy is wrong from the ground up. The current world energy crisis is not only due to the war in Ukraine and economic speculation. Those who speculate on energy bills today are the same who have produced or financed the bad inventions of the last 150 years that have produced and not corrected global warming. Among these are the absolute majorities of scientists, political entrepreneurs and economists. If that weren’t true, at least some of SPAWHE’s forty inventions would have been funded

Long before the surge in energy costs due to the consequences of the war in Ukraine, I had already reported in open letters to the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, the Italian and European governments, that anthropogenic plants, fixed and mobile, do not they can be changed if we do not start from scratch to develop the details of the organization of industrial and environmental work. In other words, environmental cycles must also be included in industrial cycles and vice versa. This means that the current purifiers, the current sewers, the current chimneys, the current thermal plants are wrong. These systems, being disconnected from each other, do not allow to carry out complete cycles, at the same time energetic and purifying. It took me sixteen years of unpaid work by anyone to develop all the details, file forty patents, writing hundreds of articles collected in chronological order on the website (The acronym spawhe means: Synergic Plants, Artificial Welling, Hydroelectromagnetic Energy).  I know very well that it is inconvenient for everyone to start from scratch in the construction of anthropogenic plants. It is also necessary to change the way of building pumps and lifting water, which involve very high energy costs. We even need to change the way people and things are transported, with global, interactive linear engines that would be able to add up the thrust of Newton and Lorentz making air and space transport the cheapest of all, without the need for roads and bridges , which are infrastructures that require very high investment costs and very high maintenance costs (see the story of the Morando bridge in Genoa). Dams in the mountains also have very high costs and create more disasters than benefits (see our Vajont tragedy). Water must be accumulated in the plains where agriculture develops because we do not need the hydraulic jump to produce electricity by dispersing water resources with one-way systems, unless a natural hydraulic jump is used. It is clear that neither governments nor multinationals are willing to make radical changes to the designs of plants, energy-intensive machines and global transport. Still, it is very strange. My inventions are very simple and straightforward. They use, to a large extent, current technologies but connect to other systems to better exploit interactive principles. Above all, we must make the pumps and hydraulic turbines work together (or the same pumps powered on the contrary that would perform the function of turbine). It is very strange that the whole world science is still silent on the evident fact that the electrical energy absorbed by the pump will always be much lower than the electricity produced by the current generator connected to the turbine, as long as we pump in the direction of the gravitational force. The higher the hydrostatic head, the higher the production of energy extracted directly from the environment without fuels, nuclear energy, solar panels and wind turbines. This is the simplest and cheapest form of energy, which science and world entrepreneurs have never realized. But if we want to raise the water we would no longer need the current pumps with relative energy consumption. Simple and inexpensive autoclaves connected as in the previous example to a circulation pump and a turbine that produces the electricity that powers the water circulation pump would be enough. Also in this case, the energy we will produce can be much higher than that absorbed by the hydraulic lifting, because the water would be raised, not by the water circulation pump but by the pressure of the compressed air contained in the autoclave. Which is not consumed (except for a small percentage that dissolves in the same water, oxygenating it). In this case the circulation pump must be modified, as it must be equipped with a second separate supply up to the impeller. In fact, one power supply must be connected to the pressurized water of the autoclave and another to the water basin to be lifted. Obviously, this system can also be used to purify polluted water in an economical way, simply by using the suction basins as a deposit for polluted water and those in delivery as a deposit for purified water, always using only energy extracted from the environment.  It is very strange that I have only collected silences. I cannot take into consideration the numerous invitations I receive as a speaker at congresses because I would have to go to such congresses at my own expense. My modest retiree finances and age, health problems, and the fact that my solitary job didn’t allow me to practice speaking English, don’t allow me. What I have to say I have written in Italian and English. I do not believe that those who govern a country should only worry about economic administration, public order, defense, delegating the production of wealth to private industry. It is too convenient to govern in this way.

It is not about communism, socialism, fascism, but simply about science, technology and the organization of work in general interests. If all the world politicians and economists who govern the world had demanded from the world of work and science the realization of complete cycles, as foreseen in the SPAWHE rhyme, today we would not have any kind of pollution, no global warming, no unemployment, and no inflation. There would not even be a need for citizenship income because everyone would have a job. There is a lot to do to demolish and reconstruct all the world’s fixed and mobile, public and private facilities in a workmanlike manner. When I started my work as an inventor, I myself never expected that to improve purification systems, I would be able to extract energy directly from gravitational force, atmospheric air and water. Even if no one has financed and implemented my solutions without explaining the reasons, it should be obvious that energy would cost almost nothing, as it would cost nothing to transport energy, for the simple fact that the ingredients used are everywhere and not. they are consumed in open systems at atmospheric pressure, while in closed, space and underwater systems, water and air can be recovered and recycled and regenerated indefinitely. There is no need for oil and gas wells, and pipelines carrying gas and oil underground and in the sea with high risks of breakage and sabotage, tankers, regasidifiers, coal mines, which have produced more disasters than benefits to the whole of humanity. On planet Earth there has never been a real scientific competition because having never studied global interactive solutions, which would have multiplied the yields and lowered the costs of energy production, the competition took place between the single  disciplinary scientific disciplines, which they continued to produce their own energy and purification, improving only the technologies of the individual processes. Obviously, the yields are conditioned by the cost and the calorific value of the thermal or nuclear energy source, by the speed of the winds, by the heat of the sun. These yields are very low but no one has ever noticed it precisely because the term of comparison with the natural interactive principles, between water and air, which cost nothing, having no extraction and processing costs, is missing. You can even multiply the yields by increasing the operating pressure of the compressed air, used statically, one-way, on incompressible water, which would act as a simple energy vector. It is known that the power of the primary dynamic fluid energy depends on the product of the flow rate of the energy fluid for the pressure and the density of the same, it is obvious that for the same flow rate, the power due to the passage of water is about 800 times higher than a gas or vapor, this being the difference in density. The temperature has nothing to do with the amount of energy produced. The reasons why science has wanted to use combustion gases and steam, which are low-density and highly polluted, are mysterious at all costs (steam is also a greenhouse gas). In other words, the science and inventors of the past have doomed the planet Earth to destruction, while the politicians and economists they rule have been watching. It is obvious that if energy were extracted directly from the environment as I hope and believe possible because no one has ever denied me, there would be no rich and poor countries and there would be no pollution. It means that the current world population could even triple without harming the environment.  This is why we should not be afraid of migrants who, moreover, would have no need to migrate. The current solutions, purification and energy, mono-thematic that science and multinationals use to purify and produce energy have become increasingly complex and expensive to cool combustion chambers and reactors, in order to contain pollution and radiation but without success. completely and in the case of nuclear power, any mistake can be lethal. The game is not worth the candle because interactive energy, never realized on planet Earth, is much simpler, cheaper and more efficient.

Science must understand that electromagnetism is also an interactive phenomenon. The terrestrial one communicates perfectly with the universal one But the terrestrial one cannot be realized in the current mobile space plants having to be produced directly in the interactive global linear motors. These can only be achieved at low terrestrial and space temperatures, certainly not with high nuclear and thermal temperatures. In fact, the coils of the electric current necessary to produce the induced currents are composed of copper wires protected with insulating paints that cannot be exposed to temperatures higher than one hundred degrees centigrade. For this reason, the current ground and space flight systems have never been able to add together the thrust of Newton and Lorentz. For this reason, space science has come to the erroneous belief that we have to exit the Earth’s atmosphere by means of rockets that reach an escape velocity of about 11.2 km / sec in order to enter space orbit and not fall back on. Earth. All this involves enormous energy costs and enormous pollution to the Earth’s environment, while we could comfortably reach the Earth’s orbit by adding together the thrust of Newton and Lorentz with very low costs and no type of pollution, being energetically autonomous, in any case, with the sum of the two thrusts in the terrestrial environment and with the single electromagnetic thrust of Lorentz into space, without falling back to the Earth.

It should be clear that I, who started the business of inventing as a retiree, not for reasons of interest, but to be able to freely express my ideas that have matured working as an industrial and then environmental designer and installer. Very few people in the world have had both experiences that are very different from each other with regards to the organization of work. If you do not know the organization of work, both from an industrial and environmental point of view, it is not possible to carry out complete cycles at the speed required by industrial processes. But also clean as the environment requires. I couldn’t and didn’t want to concentrate on making a single invention. I looked for public and private interlocutors not to get rich but to start experimenting immediately. Not having found them, I went on anyway, assuming the previous inventions working and I inserted them in the following ones. I couldn’t wait for science, entrepreneurs, politicians, economists to understand and accept my solutions. It would have taken too long as my age and my various pathologies did not allow it. I was right because in addition to diabetes, hypertension, a malfunctioning thyroid, Parkinson’s has recently appeared, fortunately still in mild form.   I preferred to develop my projects virtually but globally, based on my practical work experiences, supplemented by theoretical research aimed at the various topics covered. I had to summarize them to transfer the organization of industrial work to environmental ones to speed up and enhance environmental processes and subsequently also energy ones. It was only by developing the details of the plants in a global perspective that I was able to understand how wrong the current energies are, which in addition to being wrong, entail huge burdens of extraction from the subsoil and from the mines. The transport of raw and refined energy, but also those of electricity produced by means of electrical cables on trestles or underground, entail the same burdens. All these steps produce high yield losses, pollution and high economic costs. All this is scientifically ridiculous because at the end of my career as an inventor, I realized that the interactive primary energy does not need to be transported since the ingredients are water and air that are everywhere. Consequently, not even the electricity produced must be transported.

Interactive inventions cannot happen suddenly. They must be tested gradually by those who have the economic resources to do so. Especially the world public bodies. It is very strange that on planet Earth governments of all times have underestimated this task to favor improvised commercial inventions that are not compatible with the environment. It is equally strange that public science has accepted emission limits for toxic substances in order not to proceed with the experiments that gradually, without any doubt, would have led to the design of anthropogenic plants with zero emissions. It is very strange that on the planet science is silent on all the interactive inventions of the undersigned born from only reasoning and personal experiences in the world of real industrial and environmental work. I think it is obvious that it took over fifty years to complete the entire journey with zero public and private funding. It is not easy to work without being paid and believed by anyone. I only know that at the end of the internally virtual journey I found myself much ahead of NASA which still uses fuels to exit the Earth’s atmosphere without knowing how to return to Earth, if not through spacecraft, with relative parachutes and ditching of small crews. Instead, I resulted in a more realistic and concrete science fiction by inventing very long space caravans autonomously energetically, which also develop photosynthesis and the food chain within them. While on the outside these caravans would move with interactive global linear motors capable of adding together the thrust of Newton and Lorentz and even capturing the interstellar dust that contains all the mineral elements present on Earth to continue food cycles and industrial technologists. Obviously, it is all to be experimented but I am sure that if I had started like NASA, to use rockets with fuels, I would never have made a complete and rational reasoning. I would not have done it even if I had used old and new generation nuclear energy, being, however, an energy that is consumed and cannot be regenerated on planet Earth in a simple way starting from photosynthesis. It can only regenerate in infinite space millions of light years from planets such as Earth, where life is above all, biological. (

Dear President Meloni, if my fifty-three years of industrial, environmental and inventor experience can be of any use, I advise you not to trust the new nuclear power. This energy is not natural and is not even remotely comparable in efficiency, economy and environmental compatibility with Earth’s interactive energy. Which has never been developed and marketed only because the ingredients do not allow economic speculation and unjustified enrichment. I wrote above that planet Earth is not ready to be administered by politicians and economists unless science first solves all the problems it has not solved. But if politicians really want to govern, they must demand, even without understanding, that science closes all the chemical cycles it opens. Only in this way can science be forced to work in a multidisciplinary way and globally and simultaneously tackle purification and energy problems with maximum efficiency. Furthermore, politicians must prohibit the sale of patents of public scientists to multinational corporations. Because even multinationals are specialized in single sectors, they do not close all the cycles they open. Today we are in a paradoxical situation because both scientists and multinationals are specialized in individual sectors, while in the natural terrestrial environment everything is interactive. Therefore, the trade in specialist patents from the public to the private sector produces enormous conflicts of interest that prevent the advancement of the scientific and technological state of the art towards interactive solutions which are the only ones naturally compatible with the environment. Not even current renewable energies are naturally compatible with the environment. Even if they do not damage it, by not exploiting the physical, biological and energetic chemical interactive principles, which would multiply the performances according to the operating pressures, they have very low performances. Suffice it to say that to produce a kw / h with solar panels, about 10 square meters of panels are needed in the best solar conditions; and to exert a pressure of one bar on the wind turbines, a wind speed of about 80 km / h is required. These yields are ridiculous because if we statically exploit the pressure of an autoclave that does not consume air and endlessly recycle the water that is purified while producing energy by means of a modified pump (with the double separate power supply up to the impeller), combined with a turbine and a power generator we have no consumption of raw materials and we are not subject to sunlight or wind and therefore we do not even need energy accumulators.

If I have not been able to make myself understood by current science, by entrepreneurs, politicians and economists, at least I have managed to leave the documentation on which to think about to future generations. Even if, by now I have little else to say on a technical and scientific level and I will not write many other articles, I could not fail to write one following the recent events of the war in Ukraine; of the immense increase in energy prices that the people of the world are about to sustain; the Italian elections which for the first time allow a woman to access the prime minister. I have a lot of respect for women who in many cases are more concrete than men.

Dear President Meloni, I did not vote for your party. I always voted to the left thinking it was the lesser evil, even though the left never understood my inventions either. However, I recognize the concreteness and determination to govern this confused and disoriented country, where despite the minimum threshold of 3% to enter parliament, there are about a hundred political groups competing for power, without concrete and coherent ideas. , especially scientific. You, as a politician, did not miss a beat, to the point of becoming in a few years, from a simple militant of the party of former Prime Minister Berlusconi, the first woman Prime Minister of Italy. Probably the youngest too. I hope that you do not start making mistakes, like all those who have preceded you, precisely on environmental and energy problems. I hope that he finds the courage not to listen to bad scientific advisors, and that he knows how to find the little money necessary to experiment (discreetly, without anyone noticing) the SPAWHE rhyme, in the interest of Italians and the whole world The exams never end, above all, for the Presidents of the Council, if they want to do their job well and make history positively. As you well know, history can also be entered negatively. I, as a simple citizen, do not seek glory or personal profit. But having been a designer and inventor of industrial and environmental anthropic systems for a lifetime, I could not remain silent and not propose my solutions, that as an employee, I could not propose, as they needed to be processed with the necessary calm and independence, which I found only as a retiree If my solutions are implemented and appreciated in the future, I could also make history. I’m in no rush. I created my website in two thousand fourteen after having filed four international patents on the cleaning of fossil energy through the production of carbonates in the water that would produce the neutralization of Co2 and at the same time you, would also fight the acidification of the oceans and the melting of the glaciers. This would already have been a Nobel Prize solution. Instead, I have not found financiers neither in Italy nor in the whole world. (  

 I realized that being a mere citizen of the world away from any center of power, anything I invented against their interests, hidden or overt, would never be financed. It would be time to drop everything and go back to my retirement life. I did not do it because, as I described in the SPAWHE rhyme, it was precisely the work developed to produce the patents on the cleaning of fossil energy that inspired me the correct way to extract energy from the earth’s environment fluid dynamically and electromagnetically, without produce heat and pollution, and thus interactively connect the gravitational force, photosynthesis, the carbon cycle, terrestrial and universal electromagnetism. Knowing, from my previous experience that the current world ruling class equally would not have financed my inventions, I have minimized the costs of filing patents which have already cost me over 20,000 euros (subtracted from the modest family budget based only on my employment pension). I have called the new patents “intellectual”, paying only the Italian filing fees, not paying maintenance fees on granted patents and not making legal claims against patents not granted. In other words, my patents are legally worthless under current laws. Only in this way, I was able to continue being an inventor. I am not proud of having invented complex systems, such as old and new generation nuclear energy, but because I have simplified and saved purification, desalination, fixed and mobile energy production, including air and space. In addition, I am sure that with my “energy autonomous blood oxygenating artificial heart”, we will be able to extend human life beyond all expectations. (

The history of the near future will tell who is scientifically and morally wrong or right. For myself, the current world ruling class is not ready to accept these inventions, having to shoulder the burden of demolishing the major public and private investments made from the beginning of the industrial era to the present day. All the knots are coming to a head but the world leaders, public and private, live in another world, very different from mine, which I have always and only lived with my work, gradually developing interactive principles, neglected by science, and above all , compressed hydroelectromagnetism that can enter anywhere, even in the chest of man, being producible at the temperature of the Earth’s environment. If my inventions are rosy, sooner or later, they will flourish, without anyone being able to stop them. It will benefit the environment and the whole of humanity without distinction of race and country because no one can patent patents that have already been filed and published again. As long as I am alive my interactive energy and purification solutions, described on the website, will be available to everyone without any compensation for myself. Whether my daughters want to keep this website alive after my death will be their decision. I hope that these solutions, if and when they are tested, with Italian public money or foreigners, will serve above all to drive the merchants out of the temple, even if they pretend to be scientists, inventors and benefactors of humanity.

Luigi Antonio Pezone

I attach to this the following Spawhe rhyme and the map of the website

The cleaning of fossil energy published in spawhe, to be efficient, should be based, above all on inorganic chemistry that is able to absorb CO2, producing carbonates in the water, so that they counteract the acidification of the oceans and global warming.To speed up the processes and reduce the energy costs that would have involved the circulation of very large quantities of water necessary to neutralize the very large quantities of CO2 emitted by the current thermal power plants and heat engines, it has gradually been transformed technologically into solutions of less space by exploiting the principles Pascal and Henry.  In fact, I realized that on planet Earth, all the activities that nature produces through organic and inorganic chemistry, photosynthesis and the carbon cycle can be increased in speed without any need to use thermal, nuclear energy and current renewables. It is sufficient only to increase the operating pressures of the systems, modify the circulation pumps and make the machines work differently. In fact, natural interactive systems expel, with the times required by nature, the elements extraneous to natural cycles, due to accidental polluting phenomena, including direct and indirect thermal effects due to volcanic explosions, to natural fires that have always existed on the planet. The current industrial activities of men have multiplied exponentially the elements extraneous to natural cycles, therefore nature is no longer able to restore interactive balances. Obviously, this is my truth and in the entire website, I explain how, in my opinion, we should have created global plants that purify both fumes and water at the same time before they go to pollute the soils, rivers, lakes and seas. Having not done this in any country in the world, it has not been possible to advance the state of the art of purification to make it known to other countries. Therefore, the advancement of the state of the global purification art has not occurred. Consequently, it was not even possible to notice that the water circulation pumps, if we make them work in the direction of gravitational force, by placing them in series with the turbines, we could extract the energy directly from the environment. Having not done this, it was not possible to realize that the water circulation pumps, if in addition to making them pump in the direction of gravitational force, we modify them on the suction side and make them another inlet clearly separated from the main one up to the same impeller , we can always use the same water to create energy because we use one feed to recycle the water from the upper basin and the other feed to introduce into the same impeller the water discharged from a turbine fed by falling water from the same upper basin. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that by replacing the upper basin with a pressurized autoclave with compressed air, it being understood that we use a turbine connected to the outlet of the autoclave, we can recover the water drained from the turbine and insert it back into the autoclave, whose pressurized water is recycled with the same impeller of the pump by means of the second supply. In this way, with the same water and the same compressed air, we would have produced a current generator that extracts energy from the environment, with quite small dimensions. Having not done this, it was not possible to further reduce the dimensions of this current generator by increasing the operating pressure of the autoclave in order to be able to mount it on cars and trucks, on agricultural tractors. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that the overall dimensions can still be reduced by using submersible pumps as turbines mounted directly in cylindrical tubes that would act as autoclaves. Therefore, these groups could be used to be inserted directly into the wells to raise the water and at the same time oxygenate the aquifers which today are polluted by agricultural fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides and fecal coliforms. In fact, we know that part of the air that pressurizes the autoclave dissolves in the water according to Henry’s principle, purifying the water for free. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that the overall dimensions could be reduced even further. Even miniaturized and instead of purifying the water from the wells we could purify the human blood, placing two small autoclaves side by side that would replace the right and left ventricles, creating energetically autonomous artificial hearts that would feed the systemic circuit that oxygenates the brain and the lungs to lengthen the life of the ‘man. Having not done this, it was not possible to think that pressurized cylindrical autoclaves can be incorporated an external cylinders containing water at atmospheric pressure, outside of which sliding tracks of permanent magnets mounted on transmission chains driven by motors can be made electric at variable revolutions that would produce an electromagnetic flux of variable intensity which would produce induced currents in a solenoid outside the same water tank. Therefore, we could produce in this tank a linear electromagnetic thrust force according to Lorentz’s law at the ambient temperature, without fuel that could be added to the reaction thrust of Newton that would be produced by propellers driven by electric motors always commanded by generators. of current that produce the primary hydroelectric energy, fed by submersible pumps used as turbines placed inside the central reservoirs. Not having done this, it was not possible to replace the current thermal turbofans of aircraft to travel in the atmosphere and in space with energy extracted directly from the environment, it was not possible to create flying cars, nor submarines that move with the same system without fuel.  It was not possible to make the ships travel without fuel, nor to mount the same system to make mobile barriers in the sea to defend ourselves from high waters. It was not even possible to think that in the space travel of the future we can add to the global linear motors an external steel tunnel connected to the turbo fan, where it will produce a higher vacuum higher than the surrounding space vacuum and connect this tunnel with a small vacuum pump to a thickening tank of the captured powders, which will be emptied periodically letting in the atmospheric air which will feed an electrostatic filter that will recover the powders that will be used together with the other interactive purification and energy plant inventions described on the website https: // to make humans survive even in space without suffering physiological damage due to the absence of atmospheric pressure, gravity, food resources and raw materials to build spare parts for the machines necessary for survival in space. In fact, atmospheric air and water will fill the space caravan wagons full of human beings and will be endlessly recycled, suitably replenished with artificial photosynthesis and carbon cycle, while general gravity will be reinforced, becoming very similar. to the terrestrial one, electrostatically polarizing the paths of atmospheric conditioned air and recycled water in the interactive, energy and purification, compressed hydroelectromagnetic plants, still unknown to terrestrial science. Current science has forgotten that the primary fluid dynamic energy is produced by the flow rate for the pressure and density of the fluid itself. Therefore, the best solution to produce clean energy at low cost and in infinite quantities is: to use compressed air as an energy source (which is not consumed) and water as an energy carrier (which with the use of new pumps with separate double power supply up to the impeller, can recycle it indefinitely by exploiting the maximum pressure of the compressed air and the maximum density of the water at the same time. In the simple formula of fluid dynamic energy mentioned above, no heat source is needed. This is the biggest mistake in world science and nobody wants to correct it.”

Mappa del sito web and about spawhe,– cosa-e-spawhe,

102) 10.10.2022;

101) 28.08. 2022;

100) 10.05.2022;

99) 14.04.2022

98) 26.03.2022,


96) 27.11. 2021,

95) 13.11. 2021,

94) 01.11.2021 transition/,

93) 26.09.2021

92) 14.09.2021,

91) 29.07.2021

90) 29.07.2021

89) 22.02. 2021

88) 12.02. 2021 lettera- aperta- al- nuovo- presidente- del –consiglio- del governo- italiano-Mario- Draghi, in- materia- di ambiente- energia-e-sanità-pubblica/  

87) 01.02. 2021

86) 15.01.2021

85) 27.10. 2020,

84) 28. 10. 2020,

83) 23. 09. 2020

82) 20.09.2020

81) 14.06 2020   italiano-del-governo-di-giuseppe-conte/

80) 17.06.2020

79) 20.05.2020

78) 28.04.2020

77) 23.04.2020

76) 11.03.2020,

75) 28.02.2020,

74) 31.01.2020,

73) 31.01.2020

72) 19.12.2019

71) 16.09.2019

70) 3.09.2019

69) 30.05.2019

68) 15.04.2019

67) 11.03.2019

66) 25.01.2019

65) 10.12.2018

64) 30.08.2018,

63) 18.08.2018,

62) 11.06.2018

61) 31.05.2018

60) 30.05.2018

59) 30.05.2018,,

58) 02.04.2018,

57) 04.03.2018

56) 01.03.2018

55) 19.02.2018

54) 29.12.2017

53) 07.12.2017

52) 30.11.2017

51) 10.11.2017

50) 31.10.2017,

49) 30.10.2017

48) 30.09.2017

47) 30.09.2017

46) 04.09.2017

45) 20.08.2017

44) 04.08.2017   -a-estrarre-meglio-lenergia-dallambiente/

43) 31.07.2017

42) 13.02.2017 /the-hoax-of-the-fight-against-global-warming/

41) 13.02.2017

40) 10.02.2017

39) 14.01.2017

38) 04.01.2017

37) 15.12.2016

36) 25.11.2016

35) 15.11.2016

34) 11.11.2016

33) 10.11.2016 

32) 31.08.2016

31) 22.07.2016

30) 11.07.2016

29) 30.06.2016

28) 10.06.2016 ,

27) 10.06.2016

26) 10.06.2016 ,

25) 15. 04.2016

24) 10.06.2016

23) 09.12.2015

22) 05.12.2015 ,

21) 30.11.2015,

20) 16.11.2015 ,

19) 31.10.2015

18) 16.10.2015 ,

17) 10.09.2015 ,

16) 22.06.2015 ,

15) 15. 06.2015 ,,

14) 11.06.2015

13) 03.06.2015 ,

12) 10.05.2015 ,

11) 05.04.2015            international-patents/ ,

10) 16.12.2014

9) 30.11.2014 ,

8) 21.10.2014

7) 04.07.2014 ,

6) 04.07.2014 ,

5) 04.07.2014

4) 04.07.2014

3) 28.02. 2013 ,

2) 28.11. 2007 ,

1) 15.11.2007 ,

Best regards

Luigi Antonio Pezone