What are the reasons for the failure of COP 27? For the undersigned they are the same as the failure of the failure of all 26 previous COPs, including the good intentions of the countries that signed the Paris agreements of 2015. The Paris Agreement ( /en/policies/climate-change/paris-agreement/) presents an action plan to limit global warming. Its main elements are:

 a long-term goal – governments agreed to keep the increase in global average temperature well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to continue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C

contributions – before and during the Paris conference countries presented comprehensive national climate action plans (called Nationally Determined Contributions – NDCs) to reduce their emissions

ambition – governments have agreed to communicate their action plans every five years, each of which sets more ambitious targets

 transparency – countries have agreed to communicate their achievements in implementing their     respective targets to each other and to the public in order to ensure transparency and oversight

Solidarity – EU Member States and other developed countries will continue to provide climate finance to developing countries to help them both reduce emissions and become more resilient to counter the effects of climate change

The Paris Agreement entered into force on November 4, 2016, with the fulfillment of the condition of ratification by at least 55 countries representing at least 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions. All EU countries have ratified the agreement. But the effects of this agreement are not only not noticed. The environmental situation is much worse.

I wonder how agreements can be made without changing anything in the current anthropic purification and energy systems? How can you not understand that an ideal development model is needed to follow? Who should have developed this alternative development model? I think it should have been the organizers of the COP, that is the United Nations. How much would it cost for each sovereign state to keep this body alive, which should be above partisan interests? What should be the ideal end goals? Let’s suppose that these objectives were: zero pollution, clean energy supplied free to all, without the burden of transporting gas, oil, coal, electricity distribution networks but only the invisible electromagnetic energy and telecommunications.

It would or would not be convenient for all terrestrial sovereign states to spend a little more money, not to build but to completely demolish an energy and purification system that was wrong from the ground up.

The war in Ukraine has exposed the fragility and dangers of current energy due to the risks of nuclear accidents, the attack on the Nord Stream gas pipeline, The blocking of the supply of energy and heat to the entire population right with the start of the season winter.

As I recently wrote in an open letter to the Italian prime minister ( of-environment-and-energy/), I think that planet Earth is not yet ready to be managed by world politicians unless science first corrects its mistakes, unless the new generation politicians force science to verify current specific scientific reasoning, with global and interactive reasoning, which could lead in a very short time to start a completely different development model. Unfortunately, still virtual, as it is inconvenient for the entire world ruling class.

All inventions and specific technologies present on Earth must be reviewed, and possibly corrected to be included in future inventions of public utility worldwide. New inventions shouldn’t even be funded without being subjected to global scientific reasoning. Today global scientific disinformation involves the entire world population and the political class it governs. Advertisements are mistaken for scientific and technological progress, while the reality is very difficult to understand because global scientific and technological reasoning has always been boycotted both by science and by the entrepreneurs who produce the world’s wealth. While world public science with the consent of governments sells its patents to multinationals. It should be obvious that the true global scientific truth cannot be ascertained because it is not based on single scientific applications but on the way in which they are connected to each other: that is, on the scientific organization of not only industrial but also environmental work which is not taught in no world university training school, there being too many details to piece together. Probably, both governments and multinationals did not expect these details to be put together by myself with reasoning based only on the experience of industrial and environmental work in a virtual way, even without any public or private funding. From these details, although developed only virtually, conflicts of interest and the corresponding crimes of omission are evident, especially of global public bodies ( 

Certainly we cannot deny that human life is better than in the past, but whoever did my job as a designer and installer of anthropic plants, first industrial and then, completely changing jobs, took care of environmental plants, could not escape the moral duty to globally design man-made plants. In fact, the industrial work cycles must also include the environmental cycles and the environmental work cycles must be made faster, on a par with the industrial ones. It is no coincidence that the undersigned, in order to investigate such solutions, had to leave the current job market, which works with specific separate industrial and environmental skills. Only as a pensioner was I able to investigate the correct way to purify and produce energy. I could not have done it if I hadn’t known the industrial systems first and then the purification and energy ones, which use different machines and systems and a different scientific organization of work.

I was not surprised that on planet earth no one wanted to experiment with my inventions which inevitably would have forced us to make subsequent global reasoning, as I was forced to do, assuming that the previous inventions not financed by the current ruling class worked. It is obvious that my development model is only virtual and may seem like science fiction, but who can deny it? If no one financed the very simple basic principles that led me to modify the chimneys, the sewers, to cover the purifiers so that they do not disperse heavy gases such as CO2, combustion oxides, fine particles into the environment. It is clear that reasoning differently from other environmental and energy designers and inventors, sooner or later, I would have arrived and conceived a more complete system, both energy and purification. However, I do not boast of these insights. It was not my intention to go into space with global interactive linear motors that do not consume energy and also capture interstellar dust. I just wanted to clean up fossil energy as completely as possible, scientifically applying the organization of industrial and environmental work, doing the right operations at the right time, incorporating the purification processes into the production processes of consumer goods and fossil energy. It was a necessity to modify the chimneys, the sewers and the purifiers, in order to be able to create more complete cycles. SPAWHE’s nursery rhyme shows that they are in good faith. The inventions, published in chronological order, clearly demonstrate that what was invented later could not be invented without going through the earlier inventions.

I didn’t want to create any embarrassing situation for men of world power who think they can solve environmental and energy problems by allocating hundreds or thousands of billions to the same bodies that have produced global warming and the current distribution of world wealth If there were greater coherence on the part of politicians and the economists who govern planet earth, before allocating hundreds or thousands of billions for the definitive works, they would have to start financing and creating small demonstrative prototypes of global interactive inventions by following the instructions published on If they work, we move on to the next inventions, if they don’t work, we try to understand the reasons for the malfunction.

In the terrestrial environment everything being connected in an interactive way, it is necessary to be very careful when purifying and producing energy. Whoever invented the universe and planets like the Earth is certainly no amateur as a multidisciplinary inventor. If Earth science had learned only to locate and creatively copy interactive principles, it would also have learned to design the machines needed to painlessly and harmlessly extract energy from the Earth’s environment. This is why I insist on the SPAWHE nursery rhyme which is still culturally unknown by science and by the powerful of the Earth. Earth science, not having been able to design the plants and machines that were supposed to extract free energy directly from the gravitational force and from air and water molecules with simple interactive fluid dynamics principles, have involved combustion and nuclear energy, which the creator of the universe wisely kept well away from planets like the Earth where biological and human life developed. Today we are eight billion and on Earth, only those who investigate the division of the atom are still rewarded and those who want to simplify the fluid dynamic and hydro-electromagnetic interactive biochemical processes already experimented by the creator of the universe without the use of any technology are ignored. Today, technology is indispensable for locally increasing the speed of energy and purification processes in fixed and mobile anthropic plants by increasing the pressure of the energy source (air), the flow rate and speed of the energy vector (water). Not only to satisfy all our daily purification and energy needs, but also to be able to add together the thrust of Newton and Lorentz and make land, sea and space transport cheaper. Above all, with less infrastructure such as bridges, tunnels, viaducts that are subject to aging and collapse. Let us stop producing large structural works, which create more damage than good for the environment and for the real world economy.

Finally, I answer the question that gave the title to this article: What is the difference between virtual and real development? There is no difference between virtual and real development. The first must precede the second to avoid making a mistake in the final investments. Instead, the world’s ruling classes of the past and those of today, have done without virtual development and have proceeded directly to create the current development model, which has produced global warming and will never allow us to carry out real space exploration if we do not learn to produce global energy cycles, not based on the division of the atom, but on the correct management of terrestrial molecules developed over billions of years by nature itself, before man appeared on Earth. It is no coincidence that the first ancestors of men appeared on earth only in the last three hundred thousand years, when the earth’s environment was well cleaned of the harmful gases of the primordial era. Without purified molecules and atmospheric pressure, produced for free by gravitational force, man cannot survive. It is no coincidence that air and water are the indispensable elements also for creating chlorophyll photosynthesis and the carbon cycle. They are also infinitely recyclable. For this we must also use them in space as a primary energy source, which also serves to produce the terrestrial hydroelectromagnetism, produced at the earth’s temperature, which interacts perfectly with the universal electromagnetism produced at billions of degrees. In fact, terrestrial electromagnetism can only be produced at a low temperature so as not to overheat the copper filaments protected with insulating paints. Even water, which is the energy carrier, must not reach boiling point, nor must it freeze below zero degrees Celsius, while compressed air, which is the energy source, must be kept within the same temperatures. This can only be achieved with the control of the electric current produced with compressed hydroelectricity, which has been boycotted by science and by world entrepreneurs. ( For this reason, on planet Earth we have never been able to add together the thrust of Newton and Lorentz, and we will not be able to do it even in space with the technologies that are still being studied by public and private space bodies. ( It is not necessary to carry around useless fuels, which would not have been necessary even on Earth, if men, before creating the current real development model, had experimented with small-scale virtual development models, as summarized in Spawhe’s nursery rhyme and in more detail in website map Here is spawhe’s rhyme:

The cleaning of fossil energy published in spawhe, to be efficient, should be based, above all on inorganic chemistry that is able to absorb CO2, producing carbonates in the water, so that they counteract the acidification of the oceans and global warming.To speed up the processes and reduce the energy costs that would have involved the circulation of very large quantities of water necessary to neutralize the very large quantities of CO2 emitted by the current thermal power plants and heat engines, it has gradually been transformed technologically into solutions of less space by exploiting the principles Pascal and Henry.  In fact, I realized that on planet Earth, all the activities that nature produces through organic and inorganic chemistry, photosynthesis and the carbon cycle can be increased in speed without any need to use thermal, nuclear energy and current renewables. It is sufficient only to increase the operating pressures of the systems, modify the circulation pumps and make the machines work differently. In fact, natural interactive systems expel, with the times required by nature, the elements extraneous to natural cycles, due to accidental polluting phenomena, including direct and indirect thermal effects due to volcanic explosions, to natural fires that have always existed on the planet. The current industrial activities of men have multiplied exponentially the elements extraneous to natural cycles, therefore nature is no longer able to restore interactive balances. Obviously, this is my truth and in the entire website, I explain how, in my opinion, we should have created global plants that purify both fumes and water at the same time before they go to pollute the soils, rivers, lakes and seas. Having not done this in any country in the world, it has not been possible to advance the state of the art of purification to make it known to other countries. Therefore, the advancement of the state of the global purification art has not occurred. Consequently, it was not even possible to notice that the water circulation pumps, if we make them work in the direction of gravitational force, by placing them in series with the turbines, we could extract the energy directly from the environment. Having not done this, it was not possible to realize that the water circulation pumps, if in addition to making them pump in the direction of gravitational force, we modify them on the suction side and make them another inlet clearly separated from the main one up to the same impeller , we can always use the same water to create energy because we use one feed to recycle the water from the upper basin and the other feed to introduce into the same impeller the water discharged from a turbine fed by falling water from the same upper basin. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that by replacing the upper basin with a pressurized autoclave with compressed air, it being understood that we use a turbine connected to the outlet of the autoclave, we can recover the water drained from the turbine and insert it back into the autoclave, whose pressurized water is recycled with the same impeller of the pump by means of the second supply. In this way, with the same water and the same compressed air, we would have produced a current generator that extracts energy from the environment, with quite small dimensions. Having not done this, it was not possible to further reduce the dimensions of this current generator by increasing the operating pressure of the autoclave in order to be able to mount it on cars and trucks, on agricultural tractors. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that the overall dimensions can still be reduced by using submersible pumps as turbines mounted directly in cylindrical tubes that would act as autoclaves. Therefore, these groups could be used to be inserted directly into the wells to raise the water and at the same time oxygenate the aquifers which today are polluted by agricultural fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides and fecal coliforms. In fact, we know that part of the air that pressurizes the autoclave dissolves in the water according to Henry’s principle, purifying the water for free. Not having done this, it was not possible to think that the overall dimensions could be reduced even further. Even miniaturized and instead of purifying the water from the wells we could purify the human blood, placing two small autoclaves side by side that would replace the right and left ventricles, creating energetically autonomous artificial hearts that would feed the systemic circuit that oxygenates the brain and the lungs to lengthen the life of the ‘man. Having not done this, it was not possible to think that pressurized cylindrical autoclaves can be incorporated an external cylinders containing water at atmospheric pressure, outside of which sliding tracks of permanent magnets mounted on transmission chains driven by motors can be made electric at variable revolutions that would produce an electromagnetic flux of variable intensity which would produce induced currents in a solenoid outside the same water tank. Therefore, we could produce in this tank a linear electromagnetic thrust force according to Lorentz’s law at the ambient temperature, without fuel that could be added to the reaction thrust of Newton that would be produced by propellers driven by electric motors always commanded by generators. of current that produce the primary hydroelectric energy, fed by submersible pumps used as turbines placed inside the central reservoirs. Not having done this, it was not possible to replace the current thermal turbofans of aircraft to travel in the atmosphere and in space with energy extracted directly from the environment, it was not possible to create flying cars, nor submarines that move with the same system without fuel.  It was not possible to make the ships travel without fuel, nor to mount the same system to make mobile barriers in the sea to defend ourselves from high waters. It was not even possible to think that in the space travel of the future we can add to the global linear motors an external steel tunnel connected to the turbo fan, where it will produce a higher vacuum higher than the surrounding space vacuum and connect this tunnel with a small vacuum pump to a thickening tank of the captured powders, which will be emptied periodically letting in the atmospheric air which will feed an electrostatic filter that will recover the powders that will be used together with the other interactive purification and energy plant inventions described on the website https: // to make humans survive even in space without suffering physiological damage due to the absence of atmospheric pressure, gravity, food resources and raw materials to build spare parts for the machines necessary for survival in space. In fact, atmospheric air and water will fill the space caravan wagons full of human beings and will be endlessly recycled, suitably replenished with artificial photosynthesis and carbon cycle, while general gravity will be reinforced, becoming very similar. to the terrestrial one, electrostatically polarizing the paths of atmospheric conditioned air and recycled water in the interactive, energy and purification, compressed hydroelectromagnetic plants, still unknown to terrestrial science. Current science has forgotten that the primary fluid dynamic energy is produced by the flow rate for the pressure and density of the fluid itself. Therefore, the best solution to produce clean energy at low cost and in infinite quantities is: to use compressed air as an energy source (which is not consumed) and water as an energy carrier (which with the use of new pumps with separate double power supply up to the impeller, can recycle it indefinitely by exploiting the maximum pressure of the compressed air and the maximum density of the water at the same time. In the simple formula of fluid dynamic energy mentioned above, no heat source is needed. This is the biggest mistake in world science and nobody wants to correct it.”

Site map in descending order of publication date and about spawhe,– cosa-e-spawhe,,,

104) 23.11.2022,

103) 05.11. 2022,

102) 10.10.2022;

101) 28.08. 2022;

100) 10.05.2022;

99) 14.04.2022

98) 26.03.2022,


96) 27.11. 2021,

95) 13.11. 2021,

94) 01.11.2021 transition/,

93) 26.09.2021

92) 14.09.2021,

91) 29.07.2021

90) 29.07.2021

89) 22.02. 2021

88) 12.02. 2021 lettera- aperta- al- nuovo- presidente- del –consiglio- del governo- italiano-Mario- Draghi, in- materia- di ambiente- energia-e-sanità-pubblica/  

87) 01.02. 2021

86) 15.01.2021

85) 27.10. 2020,

84) 28. 10. 2020,

83) 23. 09. 2020

82) 20.09.2020

81) 14.06 2020   italiano-del-governo-di-giuseppe-conte/

80) 17.06.2020

79) 20.05.2020

78) 28.04.2020

77) 23.04.2020

76) 11.03.2020,

75) 28.02.2020,

74) 31.01.2020,

73) 31.01.2020

72) 19.12.2019

71) 16.09.2019

70) 3.09.2019

69) 30.05.2019

68) 15.04.2019

67) 11.03.2019

66) 25.01.2019

65) 10.12.2018

64) 30.08.2018,

63) 18.08.2018,

62) 11.06.2018

61) 31.05.2018

60) 30.05.2018

59) 30.05.2018,,

58) 02.04.2018,

57) 04.03.2018

56) 01.03.2018

55) 19.02.2018

54) 29.12.2017

53) 07.12.2017

52) 30.11.2017

51) 10.11.2017

50) 31.10.2017,

49) 30.10.2017

48) 30.09.2017

47) 30.09.2017

46) 04.09.2017

45) 20.08.2017

44) 04.08.2017   -a-estrarre-meglio-lenergia-dallambiente/

43) 31.07.2017

42) 13.02.2017 /the-hoax-of-the-fight-against-global-warming/

41) 13.02.2017

40) 10.02.2017

39) 14.01.2017

38) 04.01.2017

37) 15.12.2016

36) 25.11.2016

35) 15.11.2016

34) 11.11.2016

33) 10.11.2016 

32) 31.08.2016

31) 22.07.2016

30) 11.07.2016

29) 30.06.2016

28) 10.06.2016 ,

27) 10.06.2016

26) 10.06.2016 ,

25) 15. 04.2016

24) 10.06.2016

23) 09.12.2015

22) 05.12.2015 ,

21) 30.11.2015,

20) 16.11.2015 ,

19) 31.10.2015

18) 16.10.2015 ,

17) 10.09.2015 ,

16) 22.06.2015 ,

15) 15. 06.2015 ,,

14) 11.06.2015

13) 03.06.2015 ,

12) 10.05.2015 ,

11) 05.04.2015            international-patents/ ,

10) 16.12.2014

9) 30.11.2014 ,

8) 21.10.2014

7) 04.07.2014 ,

6) 04.07.2014 ,

5) 04.07.2014

4) 04.07.2014

3) 28.02. 2013 ,

2) 28.11. 2007 ,

1) 15.11.2007 ,

Best regards

Luigi Antonio Pezone